- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator





Op has a visa based on children private life route after marriage broke down. If children are no longer in the uk, then this is an issue. My understanding is that Op cannot sponsor the children for a visa under her current visa route.
On what basis can she bring the children back to the UK? The children themselves were dependent on the father, whose visa has expired. The visa of the children would have been co-terminous with the father (the main applicant) and therefore would have expired as well.
She was indeed granted a private life visa, likely on the basis of Article 8 of the ECHR (the right to a family life), so that she could continue to share custody of her children who were in the UK.yellowbeetle wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 4:06 pmOn the basis of this child arrangement order, I was granted parent route private life visa with recourse to public funds which helped with looking after the kids.

The poster states her children are not British, and we're not born here. How does one argue "human rights" to get status.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Jan 17, 2026 9:55 pmShe was indeed granted a private life visa, likely on the basis of Article 8 of the ECHR (the right to a family life), so that she could continue to share custody of her children who were in the UK.yellowbeetle wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 4:06 pmOn the basis of this child arrangement order, I was granted parent route private life visa with recourse to public funds which helped with looking after the kids.
But if the children are not in the UK, the whole premise of the private life visa fails. And the basis of her children's residence in the UK was their father's visa. So in a way, her status was/is dependent on her children's residence in the UK, which in turn was based on their father's residence in the UK. As that has come to an end, the whole edifice comes crashing down.
The ex-wife is of course free to attempt to switch to another visa that she may be eligible for. But I don't think she would qualify for an extension of her private life visa because there is no family life in the UK that can be the basis of an application under Article 8.
The ex-wife was given shared custody of the children by a UK family court,and it is likely that she was given a private life visa on human rights grounds for her to share the custody of the children while they were in the UK.narrative321 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 18, 2026 5:04 pmThe poster states her children are not British, and we're not born here. How does one argue "human rights" to get status.
But even if she switches to a Skilled Worker visa, she won't be able to bring her children back to the UK as her dependants without the other parent's consent. From her relate, this would be difficult to obtain.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sun Jan 18, 2026 9:48 pmWhich is why my advice has been that the ex-wife needs to find another basis of staying in the UK, such as by switching to a Skilled Worker visa, which would allow her to sponsor her children back to the UK.
I concur. What I meant was that if she were to become a Skilled Worker visa holder, she had the ability to sponsor her children, unlike her current private life visa, which does not have that ability.


No, you need to be on the relevant qualifying visa to claim domestic violence. It applies to spouses of ILR holders or British citizens. Your ex doesn't appear to be either and you dont hold a family route visa.yellowbeetle wrote: ↑Tue Jan 20, 2026 10:05 pmSlightly vonfused - you mean the kids need to be here to be able to claim via this route?