- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Boy I hate it when these newbies come on wanting advice without giving full reasons for their refusals.Refusal due to 'poor planning'...what was the actual reason was given for refusal? Do you still have legal representation?
Hi I have a lebara sim which i got on 13th october 2009 and before that have a 3 mobile sim which i used to text off. The accomodation report says that I occupy 1 of the rooms in the house.VASEY wrote:Hi Mohammed,
as there was a gap between your last contact with your wife and your application they needed to be satsfied that you did have contact, did you send anything or make any calls which will show records.
In relation to the other points you could submit a new accommodation report but act really fast. it must state you occupy the property.
If you submit the above with the appeal papers you wil have a good chance it will be reviewed. You will have a good chance.
The reasons for refusal are petty and i think you will be ok if you can prove contact.
My dad owns the house, My dad wrote a letter saying we can live rent free, and sent a copy of his title deeds, i have a lebara sim, which i got on oct 13th 2009 which shows that i kept in touch, also before that I have a 3 mobile sim which i used to text off, the sim is on my brothers name.batleykhan wrote:Hi MohammadYou state that you travelled to Pakistan in April to May 2009. Your passport does not show that you travelled to Pakistan since 2006. You say you keep in contact by telephone, you have provided phone cards as evidence of regular contact with your sponsor. However these cards have no name or personal details on them and so do not demonstrate who purchased them or whom they were used to contact. Also I am aware that these cards are readily available in Pakistan to purchase second hand. On the evidence before me I am not satisfied that these cards were used to contact your sponsor. Save for these phone cards you have not been able to supply any evidence of contact with your sponsor. Therefore on the balance of probabilities I am not satisfied that your relationship with your sponsor is subsisting or that you intend to live with your sponsor. Paragraph (iii) HC395
Your sponsor has not provided any evidence that he occupies the accommodation where he resides. Therefore on the balance of probabilities I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of paragraph 281 (iv) HC 395
You are not from Batley by any chance?
Mohammad if you have read my earlier post somewhere here, You will see that I pointed out the disadavantages of using calling cards. The ECO has pointed out the reasons why, these cards are not acceptable.
I am afraid unless you can provide evidence of how you kept in contact with your wife, its going to be difficult.
Did you send any hand written letters, emails etc?. What about sending her money?. Have you got receipt for it. Things like these will do.
As far as your acommadation is involved, beside doing the report, did you send any proof that you actually own it and live there ( eg bills etc)?
I sent bank statements for a year, I gave money to family to ger to her, am going to send her some this week,batleykhan wrote:Hi MohammadYou state that you travelled to Pakistan in April to May 2009. Your passport does not show that you travelled to Pakistan since 2006. You say you keep in contact by telephone, you have provided phone cards as evidence of regular contact with your sponsor. However these cards have no name or personal details on them and so do not demonstrate who purchased them or whom they were used to contact. Also I am aware that these cards are readily available in Pakistan to purchase second hand. On the evidence before me I am not satisfied that these cards were used to contact your sponsor. Save for these phone cards you have not been able to supply any evidence of contact with your sponsor. Therefore on the balance of probabilities I am not satisfied that your relationship with your sponsor is subsisting or that you intend to live with your sponsor. Paragraph (iii) HC395
Your sponsor has not provided any evidence that he occupies the accommodation where he resides. Therefore on the balance of probabilities I am not satisfied that you meet the requirements of paragraph 281 (iv) HC 395
You are not from Batley by any chance?
Mohammad if you have read my earlier post somewhere here, You will see that I pointed out the disadavantages of using calling cards. The ECO has pointed out the reasons why, these cards are not acceptable.
I am afraid unless you can provide evidence of how you kept in contact with your wife, its going to be difficult.
Did you send any hand written letters, emails etc?. What about sending her money?. Have you got receipt for it. Things like these will do.
As far as your acommadation is involved, beside doing the report, did you send any proof that you actually own it and live there ( eg bills etc)?
Why was it rejected in May , yet it took 3.5 months for you to recieve response /refusal notice?. If that is the case I can understand why the AIT or BHC are saying your appeal was lodged out of time.Applied 29th April 09
rejected 8th May 09
Recieved response 18th Auguast 09
Lodged Appeal 2nd Sep 09,
ISLakhan19 wrote:Could anyone be kind enough to advise me of the prefix to the tracking number if the case was submitted in Islamabad, i would be extremely appreciative of your advice, many thanks
i have the numbers but do not know the letters that go before
Why was it rejected in May , yet it took 3.5 months for you to recieve response /refusal notice?. If that is the case I can understand why the AIT or BHC are saying your appeal was lodged out of time.batleykhan wrote:You can do one of two things:
Get your hubby to make a new application ensuring you correct the reasons that he was refused on first time around and hope for the best.
As far as your appeal goes
Applied 29th April 09
rejected 8th May 09
Recieved response 18th Auguast 09
Lodged Appeal 2nd Sep 09,