- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Thanks for your response. she was not employed at all and she was not registered in any job centre to look for a job (She is a medical doctor) and we were not looking for a job for her as my job is covering all our needs. She was working when we were in Canada but not since we moved to UK as she was since then looking after the kids.Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:What you did during the 5 year period is not considered in a PR decision. It all revolves around the EU citizen.
What exactly was your wife's relationship to her job in this period? Was she technically employed but on maternity leave? Was she self-employed but not actively working for clients?
Thanks again for your prompt response. I would be surprised if I was turned down, the whole shenanigan of having insurance did not exist at all when I applied the first time around for the Permit, otherwise, how am I supposed to know.. just keep reading the UKBA website just because I have nothing else to do in my life!Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:You are in an interesting position, and I urge you to apply for the PR in any case.
According to the rules that UKBA uses, they require CSI when the EU citizen is not working. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/e ... ent_evalua lays out their handling of women who stop working to become parents.
I think you will be turned down on the PR application, but I think you might win on appeal. I think you can argue it is discriminatory to women that when they stop working to take care of their new children, that their husband's are punished and loose their PR.
I would be happy to help you in your applications, on a very non professional basis.
The requirement for CSI has been in the regulations since 2006 although I don't know if the UKBA enforced that in 2007.UKnow wrote:I would be surprised if I was turned down, the whole shenanigan of having insurance did not exist at all when I applied the first time around for the Permit, otherwise, how am I supposed to know
The nationality team is likely to have the same view as the European cases team and will require CSI. The difference is that EEA3 application is free and naturalisation costs £850. Better to find out where you stand now when it's free.I am thinking of doing the EEA2 for extension for another 5 years for permanent residence now and then when I finished 6 years ( 1 year from now) I will apply for citizenship
I would skip CSI for the children. Having PR for them has no real meaning.I also forgot to say that We have 3 kids ( 2 of them born in UK) not sure if I need insurance for them as well or will this not bee needed. I am not including them in my application as they are all EU citizens (Austrians)
The requirement for CSI has been in the regulations since 2006 although I don't know if the UKBA enforced that in 2007.Jambo wrote:UKnow wrote:I would be surprised if I was turned down, the whole shenanigan of having insurance did not exist at all when I applied the first time around for the Permit, otherwise, how am I supposed to know
Thank you, I guess I will go for the application and get insurance for both of us for now and see what they come back with...EUsmileWEallsmile wrote:As you received an residence card, you might get away with the requirement for CSI, though you would have been required to have it to qualify. Why? If they'd rejected your application at the time, you could have rectified it. You can't do so retrospectively (ie you can't buy insurance for the past).
I have to say I'm pretty confused now. Was your wife employed at time of application? If yes, then you applied under a different basis.UKnow wrote:Hello.. I managed to find an old application version from 2008, I believe what I had listed then was she is employed as then they allowed for me to put my details as the employed one in section 4 P8 and under section 9 of the link below. This is why they did not then ask for any insurance as I was employed which meant she was then.. This is now puzzling me and I am thinking should I then put the status as employed instead of self sufficient?
http://www.giolegal.co.uk/Docs/Immigrat ... 9/eea2.pdf
The OP stated in his first post thatDirective/2004/38/EC wrote:Jambo,
EEA citizens can shift from category to category at time progresses. She started off working, then at some point she had children and decided to take time with them. At some point in the future she may decide to start working again.
At the time of the original RC application, she was evidently working.
She would have still been required to have CSI (at least according to UKBA) at any time after the application that she was not working.
.we came to the UK in April 2007 ... My wife did not work throughout the 5 years as she is looking after the children
Was your wife employed at time of application? No she wasn't
I understand what you mean now. You filled the form in as instructed in good faith. I think you have a very good case for PR. If they'd rejected your application on the basis of CSI, you could have remedied that by obtaining it at the time. You can't now that you did not have it. I hope you understand what I mean by this.UKnow wrote:I have to say I'm pretty confused now. Was your wife employed at time of application? If yes, then you applied under a different basis.
No she was not, but the application at section 4 asked for me to put my details instead of hers if I was supporting her which I was at the time ( and still am).
" S E C T I ON 4 - Y O U R E E A O R SWI S S N A T I O N A L F AMI L Y MEMB E R ( EMP L O YME N T )
You must complete this section if your EEA or Swiss national family member is a worker i. e a person pursuing an effective and genuine
activity for remuneration as an employed person. If you are supporting them through working, you must complete this section
with your details."
By putting that part as employee which they asked for, I did not have to fill her details under self sufficient and it was approved then. This is why she was classified under employed I guess ( the application is the confusing part I guess then and now as well)
I will phone them tomorrow to confirm as this is very confusing
I just found the two versions from 2006 and 2007 ( links below) same as the 2008
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j& ... vNhhP_7e_w
http://www.daniellecohenimmigration.com ... DFinal.pdf
Agree that people's circumstances can change in general and they would be expected to comply with the new conditions (if any); the OP applied in good faith on one basis (even though they did not appear to strictly meet the conditions) and had application accepted. I think he stands a good chance of obtaining PR card.Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:Jambo,
EEA citizens can shift from category to category at time progresses. She started off working, then at some point she had children and decided to take time with them. At some point in the future she may decide to start working again.
At the time of the original RC application, she was evidently working.
She would have still been required to have CSI (at least according to UKBA) at any time after the application that she was not working.
UKNow,
Do you need proof of your ability to work? If so apply now for a new RC, though state on the application that you believe you qualify already for PR and this is just an convenience application for the RC.
I don't thing the OP has made any application yet (and therefore has not had a rejection).Directive/2004/38/EC wrote:If I were you...
I would want clarity primarily on my ability to work. And I would want it closed and clear as soon as possible. That says to me to apply for a new RC with the caveate wording that I mentioned earlier.
In the meantime I would appeal the existing rejection of the PR. I do not think there is any point in applying again for PR - I think you will again get rejected so might as well just appeal the current rejection.
In the case of ALL applications, keep photocopies of EVERYTHING you send.