- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Actually this is not true, if you failed to provide a document but the document does exist and it predates application date then it is allowed for consideration at both ECM review stage and court hearing. For example if your refused because you didnt provide pay slips for the six month prior to the application you can appeal and provide the relevant pay slips and the appeal will be allowed provided they meet the relevent requirements. You cannot however use evidence from after the date of application this is the key.MPH80 wrote:Could you post the text of the refusal and what evidence you did provide?
The rules are now quite strict about what evidence you must supply - so if you failed to provide it and UKBA are right - an appeal won't help.
M.
saadkhan wrote:I have provided all the documents however my employer letter does not include all the details they have listed. It confirms my role and salary, but does not specify the type of employment and a statement confirming that the stated salary was paid to the employee each month (as requested in their list). However I have recently requested my employer another letter which includes all the details. Can I use this in my appeal?
Yes you can send this, but make sure it contains all the information.Normally this takes the form of of am Employment contract, which is something that is now issued to every employee by the employers. This should include job title,hours to be worked, salary per annum, whether job is temp or perm.
Secondly, in the grounds for appeal should we clearly state that we are providing additional documents which should fulfill any remaining requirements or should we just send all the documents with the appeal?
You only need to send additional docs on points you were refused and are now to prove your point.You do not need to send docs that you sent with your application.
My solicitor is of the view that we should only send the notice of appeal at the moment and not the evidence. And when we get the notice of hearing then only we send the documents, as we will get a chance to send the whole documents then. Is it true, because from my research if we send the documents now with the appeal these can be reviewed by ECM however if we wait till the court hearing, this will only leave all the decision making to be left till the hearing date. Hence the solicitor is trying to deliberately take the case to the hearing stage so that I can be charged the barrister fees. what is your idea?
Yes you are right about your comments about your solicitor.You need to send docs in case ECM changes his mind and decides to issue visa on review,without matter going to full appeal hearing.If I was in your shoes, I would do the appeal myself rather than employ a solicitor who in my opinion is into make a quick buck or two, on a point which is not that difficult to disprove
On last question, do I need to send all my documents again in the appeal or just the ones which they have questioned, i.e. relating to my financial status?
See above comments
I really appreciate your advice, thanks again guys.
Regards,
Saad
AfiaShuja wrote:Hi, m going through a similar situation....iit's like, my settlement application was rejected on the basis that I didn't provide my husband's eemployment letter. I am planning to file an appeal n have also arranged the letter which will be delivered most probably in a week. The trouble is that I've read on another forum that "new documents cannot be provided when appealing if you lacked them while submitting your application" so m a little worried if I should continue with appeal or not.
Please help me out
You'reve been a great helPObie wrote:The law states that refusal on the basis of those missing evidence is unlawful unless the Entry Clearance Officer can show that the application would have been refused in any event and therefore requesting those evidence will make no difference to the application.
Have you received decision on your appeal? How much time did it take?saadkhan wrote:Hi guys,
I need someone's advice urgently.
My wife applied for UK settlement Visa from ISB in October. However UKBA decided to refuse the application on the basis that I have not provided complete documents of my financial status, i.e. payslips etc. I want to appeal on this decision as I did provide them everything they have asked for in the application form. However I have also prepared some more documents to support my case, i.e. Statement of Earning and P60.
I want to know whether I should do a written appeal or an oral? Considering I have all the documents already should I go through a solicitor or appeal myself?
Solicitors are taking 500 quid to send the appeal to the tribunal which basically is covering letter and the notice form filled and send to the address.
Has anyone had an experience of appealing without a solicitor and on a refusal of this kind how much time does it take to get a reply from UKBA?
I will appreciate if someone can advise on this case.
regards,
saad
Dear Obie - would you please let me know where it is stated what you mentioned? My Visa was refused because of a single missing payslip and they've been holding my passport for more than a year now pending appeal. If you could please let me know that would be very much appreciated.Obie wrote:The law states that refusal on the basis of those missing evidence is unlawful unless the Entry Clearance Officer can show that the application would have been refused in any event and therefore requesting those evidence will make no difference to the application.