- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
this looks interesting...Brigid from Ireland wrote: It is quite usual for Eastern European fathers working in Ireland to claim child benefit for children living in Poland, so fathers can claim child benefit, even if the child does not live with them.
DOES THIS APPLY IN THE UK ALSO?Brigid from Ireland wrote:I would agree with you. Non-legal work does not help with the habitual residence condition. The OP was non-legal until the twins were born.
The question is did it become legal for her to work the moment the citizen twins were born - she can argue it became legal for her to work the day they were born, as she has a right to work in order to support her citizen twins.
It is also possible to argue that legal work can only commence after getting permission under Zambrano. This arguement would possibly fail in court - the twins must be provided for, and how else can they be provided for, other than by a parent who works?
Well I have written numerous emails to UKBA, also to Solvit now, and my mp etc...Brigid from Ireland wrote:The phrasing 'we cannot confirm your right to work' is interesting. It reads as civil service speak for 'we have not processed your application and have made no decision yet'.
I would suggest you tell them that your wife has been offered a job and she intends to commence employment if they have do not object within 21 days. This puts them in an awkward position - if they think she has the right to work they will be reluctant to object.
as it doesnt state SOLELY dependant, it states dependant (note it doesnt even state financially - so could mean, emotionally, physically, etc too)On those grounds, the Court (Grand Chamber) hereby rules:
Article 20 TFEU is to be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a Member State from refusing a third country national upon whom his minor children, who are European Union citizens, are dependent, a right of residence in the Member State of residence and nationality of those children, and from refusing to grant a work permit to that third country national, in so far as such decisions deprive those children of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of European Union citizen.
Subject:
Complaint as to UKBA Staff, EEA2 Application, COA, ETC.
From:
zzzz
To:
liverpooleuro.passportreturns@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk; Nadhim.zahawi.mp@parliament.uk; solvit@bis.gsi.gov.uk; UKBACustomerComplaints@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk;
Date:
Wednesday, 13 February 2013, 2:05
my name and address
Dear Sirs,
I am writing to you AGAIN in regards to the application of my wife: Mrs xxxxxx xxxxxxxx
Royal Mail Package: xxxxx (Delivered on 15th Jan 2013) HO Ref: xxxx and Case ID: xxxxx
(In case you are going to request further reference numbers, the return barcodes of provided are: xxxx and xxxxxx)
This is not the first time I have contacted yourself in regards to this matter... Please see below for previous messages.
On 8 March 2011 the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in the Zambrano case C 34/09 http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/f ... ff=C-34/09, that an EU member state may not refuse the non-EU parents of a dependent child who is a citizen of, and resident in, an EU member state the right to live and work in that member state. As you can see from the documentation provided for my wifes EEA2 application, she has two dependant British Citizen children.
I am therefore requesting that further to previous emails to yourself, and additional postal letters this situation be resolved.
My wifes Certificate of Application failed to confirm her right to work within the UK. This is not the case. As evidenced in the case above, my wife already has the right to work in the UK, and UKBA must confirm this right.
EU Legislation states that a Certificate of Application must be processed IMMEDIATELY. I am therefore expecting a fresh COA to be sent to my wife, XXXXX XXXXXXX (Again, you have proof of her name - our marriage certificate). Your COA gave a couple of examples of when you cannot verify a persons right to work within the UK, however, none of the examples provided apply to my wife.
I note that as EU law states that my wife has a Derivative Right of Residence within the UK, she cannot therefore be deported from the UK. Failure to grant my wife permission to work effectively leaves our children in a state of destitution. We have limited funds to survive, by failing to verify my wifes right to work within the UK this situation is worsened, and could effectively mean our children are foced to leave the UK so as to be able to survive.
I have also sent this email to my local MP, and am hoping that something is done in relation to this. In addition to this, I will be filing a formal complaint with SOLVIT in relation to the manner in which her case is being handled.
In addition to this, I have previously requested the return of the passports included in the application... Under EU Law, upon request, documents should be returned ASAP (and within your own guidelines within 20 working days). My passport is required for employment and identification purposes (however - I do not legally have to provide a reason as to my need for my passport to be returned!)
I also direct your attention to the message below, in relation to "Richard" at the UKBA reporting centre on Homer Road, Solihull. The attitude of this member of staff (in addition to that of "Reena" - I am unsure as to whether this is the correct spelling of her name). This member of staff outright told my wife that she would not be permitted entry into Ireland (Republic of). He is not in a position as to 1) Give immigration advice, 2) Dictate as to Irish imigration proceedures. In fact, I provide the attached emails from the Irish Embassy here in London - neither email even hints at the fact that my wife could be refused entry into Ireland - the reason being Directive 2004/38/EC does not allow for her refusal of entry bar: Article 22 - Public Policy, Public Security and Public Health (none of which apply).
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex ... 123:en:PDF
Again, Perhaps it is wise for UKBA to read the actual legislation which it is required to follow as per EU LAW also covering the UK. Particularly Article 23. Also, dating back previously to this: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, of 20 November 1989 - which particularly protects the links of a child to their family members.
(This case has the following children: XXX XXX, and XXX XXXX).
Now, Please respond in relation to all of the points raised within this email. I note that neither myself nore my wife have recieved any response to our written communication to yourselves (letters delivered by Royal Mail).
Yours,
Mr xxxxx
iwonderwhy wrote:I am an illegal alien, have been in Ireland for 6 years. I stay with a relative. Came to Ireland with my son and daughter (non-Irish). Last year gave birth to twins (father is Irish) we do not leave together though, thereafter I applied under Zambrano.
My application has been with DoJ for the last 8 months and still waiting for a decision.
The problem my kids have lived basically out of handouts from my relative, I would get money here and there. Never claimed social (no gnib) now things are getting hard for my relative and is now often suggesting i go to my Local Office to ask for financial help.
i feel uncomfortable with this as i feel it will affect my application. Never claimed Child Benefit for all my children so its really a struggle.
by eu law the acknowledgement letter giving to you when you made the application is your legal resident document give it to the benefit people as a prove and the children passports. They cant refused the children their rightnss an irish or better go to your lawyer and tell him what I sa7d andntell him to apply for benefit for you for tge children. By eu law on zambrano they must grant the benefits, you dont need theie dad because its useless mentioning him and with him you nay lost your zambrano case. The acknowledgement letter from doj under eu law is a proof of your residency right. I am wrtting from experience and this is the only piece of advice I can give.
Is it better to wait for a decision under Zambrano, or should I go to SWA/SWO.
Please advice a sister out.