- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
Yes you are right but UKBA want to keep the money in account and available to you all the time and if some part of its is invested need proof of that. They are not bothered about anything else like you mention about make profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.sm12 wrote:What entrepreneur will invest all the money in the business when it's not needed, or keep it in the bank account, when the money can be invested in other assets and earn a higher return, and freed as and when required. No sane entrepreneur would keep idle cash/funds lying around in a personal/business current account, when he can make a profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.
Yes, you are right. But by asking people to hold on to 200,000K in the bank account when it is not required, they are definitely not going to be attracting enterprising talent to the UK! It simply does not make any financial sense.rehan01 wrote:Yes you are right but UKBA want to keep the money in account and available to you all the time and if some part of its is invested need proof of that. They are not bothered about anything else like you mention about make profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.sm12 wrote:What entrepreneur will invest all the money in the business when it's not needed, or keep it in the bank account, when the money can be invested in other assets and earn a higher return, and freed as and when required. No sane entrepreneur would keep idle cash/funds lying around in a personal/business current account, when he can make a profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.
regards
sm12 wrote:Yes, you are right. But by asking people to hold on to 200,000K in the bank account when it is not required, they are definitely not going to be attracting enterprising talent to the UK! It simply does not make any financial sense.rehan01 wrote:Yes you are right but UKBA want to keep the money in account and available to you all the time and if some part of its is invested need proof of that. They are not bothered about anything else like you mention about make profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.sm12 wrote:What entrepreneur will invest all the money in the business when it's not needed, or keep it in the bank account, when the money can be invested in other assets and earn a higher return, and freed as and when required. No sane entrepreneur would keep idle cash/funds lying around in a personal/business current account, when he can make a profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.
regards
Yes correct that is wht my opinion too .sm12 wrote:Being a genuine entrepreneur and utilising the resources to maximise gains are not mutually exclusive.
Obviously, the funds can be freed as when the business needs them. Investing money in assets instead of keeping it idle in the bank makes business sense, it doesn't mean you're not a genuine applicant with no intention to run and invest in a business.
Anyway, it's probably to control the number of visas issued as you said, more than anything else.
well no one is telling us to come to UK on entrepreneur visa is it ? that is why they are tightening things upRizKCB wrote:Nothing special for educated entrepreneurs because intellectual property cannot be kept in banks. Only these people can invest to buy office buildings, equipment and furniture. What a genuine entrepreneur?
It is good to run Chicken Shop, Pizza Shop, Grocery Shop or online retail shops etc with labeling ourselves Sales and Marketing Directors. These businesses are good enough for real investments. What a genuine entrepreneur?
This is a new rule to keep amount in the bank throughout until the last penny to invest. I guess it is new rule which should not be applicable to previous applicants. To show the availability and invest that within 3 years fulfills their requirements. It never means a system abuse. As an entrepreneur at least I would never stop my business in my home country to invest in UK and keeping that money struck when there is no use of it. I would prefer to keep running my business in my home country and inject the money time to time in the UK business. It makes sense.
Definitely on extension time they will prove some thing to sTOp PR, its phenomenal signs, they don't want immigrants for sure,sm12 wrote:Well the money can be held overseas but only in your bank account apparently. It's quite ridiculous but it is what it is I guess.
Clearly stopping immigrants is more important than boosting the economy. I say this primarily because I think this rule will deter many talented entrepreneurs from moving to the UK and investing. Just think of the opportunity cost of holding idle funds in your bank account.
Can I ask about the reference for above statistics? They seems so interesting.rehan01 wrote:sm12 wrote:Yes, you are right. But by asking people to hold on to 200,000K in the bank account when it is not required, they are definitely not going to be attracting enterprising talent to the UK! It simply does not make any financial sense.rehan01 wrote:Yes you are right but UKBA want to keep the money in account and available to you all the time and if some part of its is invested need proof of that. They are not bothered about anything else like you mention about make profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.sm12 wrote:What entrepreneur will invest all the money in the business when it's not needed, or keep it in the bank account, when the money can be invested in other assets and earn a higher return, and freed as and when required. No sane entrepreneur would keep idle cash/funds lying around in a personal/business current account, when he can make a profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.
regards
Yea agree with you but unfortunately they don't care about it and probably that's what they want or they think by doing this only genuine genuine person will apply only as we all know the currect situation and figures shows the same that in 2011 only 768 applicantion received, in 2012 frm january till november 6900 aprox and in december on its own 3000 aprox so ofcourse it ring alarm everywhere that there is something wrong and that is why all these restrictions are in place but again for genuine applicant nothing to worry about at all.
Regards
samira_uk wrote:Can I ask about the reference for above statistics? They seems so interesting.rehan01 wrote:sm12 wrote:Yes, you are right. But by asking people to hold on to 200,000K in the bank account when it is not required, they are definitely not going to be attracting enterprising talent to the UK! It simply does not make any financial sense.rehan01 wrote:
Yes you are right but UKBA want to keep the money in account and available to you all the time and if some part of its is invested need proof of that. They are not bothered about anything else like you mention about make profit on it while the money is not needed for investment.
regards
Yea agree with you but unfortunately they don't care about it and probably that's what they want or they think by doing this only genuine genuine person will apply only as we all know the currect situation and figures shows the same that in 2011 only 768 applicantion received, in 2012 frm january till november 6900 aprox and in december on its own 3000 aprox so ofcourse it ring alarm everywhere that there is something wrong and that is why all these restrictions are in place but again for genuine applicant nothing to worry about at all.
Regards