- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Again, there ought to be an appeals and/or complaints procedure. Nothing in the pdf document (part 3) I posted earlier alludes to returning to country.Stuartb wrote:so the if they've refused based on that (I'll find out tomorrow when my wife emails the refusal letter) then they've got it wrong and they should give her the visa?
While that might be applicable to another type of applicant. In your wife's case, it is not at all relevant. Was there an appeal / complaints process mentioned?Stuartb wrote:Here is the reason for the refusal:
Your intention to leave the territory of the member states before the expiry of the visa could not be ascertained. Since it has not been demonstrated or established to a reasonable degree of credibility that you have a regular and substantial income in your country of origin/habitual residence to support yourself, it is not felt to be sufficiently probable that you will return to your country of origin promptly, due in part to the local or general situation in your country of origin/habitual residence and/or your weak ties there. In this connection, it should be noted that one of the basic criteria for the issue of visas is the prevention of illegal migration. In determining whether there is a risk of illegal migration, immigration authorities examine the local and general situation in your country of origin/long term residence and your personal situation
To remain legally (in the sense of the directive), one must be in compliance with the pretty limited conditions therein.Pablito wrote:I think even if you stayed for longer than 3 months without job you could still remain there. I don't know exactly how it works with those 3 months but when I first arrived to UK 8 yrs ago I never knew anyone who stayed there for more than 3 months and was removed, I think for this to happen you would actually need to become burden on social assistance system. So I would say this worrying about 3 months is some kind of myth.
I am not sure though what is the case when your wife is there with you for more than 3 months, but I think you could still remain there with her just basically without residence card.
Let someone correct me here if I am wrong...
You could do, but I take that the Netherlands is where you will end up. You will need to get that sorted out one way or the other.Stuartb wrote:What if we're up front with them and tell them the dutch embassy got it wrong?
I can't count the number of times I've told my wife it'll all be sorted soon
In general, an EU citizen can visit another EU country for up to three months with only a valid passport. Their spouse can be with them. After three months, the EU citizen may be required to be a worker, etc.Stuartb wrote:I spoke to some people today who give immigration advice but whose information might not be 100%, they said the embassy had a right to refuse because I'm not registered here yet but I thought just being here was enough, they said it was pointless registering an objection against the embassy for that reason, so is it worth registering the objection? As I am exercising my treaty rights by being here.
Also just to cover all bases, if I just went there now and brought her back with me would she definitely be allowed into the Netherlands without a visa?Could we get onto the plane in the first place? As long as we can prove we're married, or is there a chance they'd refuse to let her in and stop us?
Well the first step in your road is convincing yourself that you are in the right.Stuartb wrote:I've read through the rules so many times and I'm sure I know what they are but it seems I'm constantly having to try to convince people of the rules, the people that matter don't seem to know them