- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
RizKCB wrote:I remember one of my friend's friend who was refused on the basis that he could not genuinely establish his business because before 3 years time, his 10 years as a legal residence would led him to get ILR and in Entrepreneur Scheme, HO would not be able to justify his business progress.
It happened about 7-8 months back and he launched appeal. I dont know what happened later.
I think on the same probability, caseworker refused you. 'Probabilities' could not be exchanged with 'Facts'. You have facts to present in appeal. Go ahead and you will win.
business genius wrote:who ever has got the visa its their luck!!!
So don't even discuss the reason or genuine ness of others.
Your concern should be with your own refusal and the reasons given by UKBA. Its very subjective reason that you don't seem to be genuine business person. One of the strong refusal reason might be ur business and educational backgrounds are two different things. I think good barrister will collect the good reasons to justify it in appeal
Go ahead and appeal!!Good luck, Be positive and look for an opportunity in this decision.
1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?Naheedsammar wrote:over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured? how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview? when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine. they got nothing to lose and i think this is the toughest bases on which somebody is been refused coz its not easy to prove even in appeal.
Shinya wrote:1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?Naheedsammar wrote:over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured? how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview? when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine. they got nothing to lose and i think this is the toughest bases on which somebody is been refused coz its not easy to prove even in appeal.
ans -- over the documents you have supplied and after the interview
2] how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview?
ans -- just the same way we give one or two hours examination at the end of one whole year which decides whether we pass or fail.
3] when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine.??
ans -- No, the interview is also an evidence. What and how you answer is recorded. Its just like a police interrogation. It is not a job interview if that is what people think it to be.
Some agents say, if you got interview call that means you will 100% get visa. It is the other way round.
When one goes for interview, they must go fully prepared to answer any question related to their application, their business and finances.
All fine, first of all, ent123 keep your spirits high as my brother went into appeal on something similar to your situation and he won it after a proper fight back. Every one knows if you want to " Stay here and do whatever you want to do " then I have not seen many people going back home!
Secondly do a good preparation for appeal and AT least I am 110% sure judge will " allow your appeal"
Finally keep smiling and carry on, all the best
My post is not directed to any particular member. I am not defending UKBA, but just trying to remove the misconception people have about interview.
Shinya wrote:1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?Naheedsammar wrote:over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured? how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview? when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine. they got nothing to lose and i think this is the toughest bases on which somebody is been refused coz its not easy to prove even in appeal.
ans -- over the documents you have supplied and after the interview
2] how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview?
ans -- just the same way we give one or two hours examination at the end of one whole year which decides whether we pass or fail.
3] when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine.??
ans -- No, the interview is also an evidence. What and how you answer is recorded. Its just like a police interrogation. It is not a job interview if that is what people think it to be.
Some agents say, if you got interview call that means you will 100% get visa. It is the other way round.
When one goes for interview, they must go fully prepared to answer any question related to their application, their business and finances.
My post is not directed to any particular member. I am not defending UKBA, but just trying to remove the misconception people have about interview.
Shinya wrote:1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?Naheedsammar wrote:over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured? how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview? when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine. they got nothing to lose and i think this is the toughest bases on which somebody is been refused coz its not easy to prove even in appeal.
ans -- over the documents you have supplied and after the interview
2] how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview?
ans -- just the same way we give one or two hours examination at the end of one whole year which decides whether we pass or fail.
3] when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine.??
ans -- No, the interview is also an evidence. What and how you answer is recorded. Its just like a police interrogation. It is not a job interview if that is what people think it to be.
Some agents say, if you got interview call that means you will 100% get visa. It is the other way round.
When one goes for interview, they must go fully prepared to answer any question related to their application, their business and finances.
My post is not directed to any particular member. I am not defending UKBA, but just trying to remove the misconception people have about interview.
total BULLSHITShinya wrote:
1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?
ans -- over the documents you have supplied and after the interview
2] how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview?
ans -- just the same way we give one or two hours examination at the end of one whole year which decides whether we pass or fail.
3] when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine.??
ans -- No, the interview is also an evidence. What and how you answer is recorded. Its just like a police interrogation. It is not a job interview if that is what people think it to be.
Some agents say, if you got interview call that means you will 100% get visa. It is the other way round.
When one goes for interview, they must go fully prepared to answer any question related to their application, their business and finances.
My post is not directed to any particular member. I am not defending UKBA, but just trying to remove the misconception people have about interview.
If you dont agree, please dont. But, what you have written about me is very nasty and baseless and sheer nonsense....if you were an educated person, you would have never written like this in public. Did I say anything personal to you that you are attacking me this way saying I asked your friend for money??Sug wrote:
I don't agree with you in this matter just because one can't answer the questions can't say they are not genuine
But also here in this room every body main intention is to stay in uk
And what ever ukba set up the standerds for the immigrants there are people who mould themselves to fit into the requirements that what makes immigrants more successfull than the locals ,they have survived all the hardships and put all their strengths to settle in any first world
Best of luck to every one and even if u get rejected based on interview there are fair chances to win in appeal
And a successfull business can't be decided in closed doors by ukba
End of the day it's the applicants money
And about you ,u have put me a private msg asking my friend to give you money so that you can drop for visa ,you are the one who want to come from back door to get visa there are people in this forum who are genuine and facing problems please don't just scare people saying that ukba interview is just like police interrogation , even the recorded statement in the police interrogation is not considered as an evidence in the court .end of the day it's the requirement of evidence that you establish at appeal court .
rehan01 wrote:Ent2013 so sorry to hear this sad news but I am sure you will be fine in appeal and don't worry abt anything ..... like they said you are not going to invest and to them you doesn't seems to be genuine fair enough......
go in appeal and prove this that you are genuine as you have funds you meet all the requirement and do not worry it will be in your favour and don't worry about what people saying or discussing here.
there are also genuine people here who are really helping each other and same time there are few people who are using this as there market place tooo.
so not a biggie it will be fine and do keep as posted.
regards
babylondoner wrote:total BULLSHITShinya wrote:
1] over this debate of Genuine or non genuine my question is how it can be measured?
ans -- over the documents you have supplied and after the interview
2] how possibly you can say somebody is genuine or not just after an hour of interview?
ans -- just the same way we give one or two hours examination at the end of one whole year which decides whether we pass or fail.
3] when somebody cant be refused on the basis of documentary evidence then its really only way to refuse them by saying that you are not genuine.??
ans -- No, the interview is also an evidence. What and how you answer is recorded. Its just like a police interrogation. It is not a job interview if that is what people think it to be.
Some agents say, if you got interview call that means you will 100% get visa. It is the other way round.
When one goes for interview, they must go fully prepared to answer any question related to their application, their business and finances.
My post is not directed to any particular member. I am not defending UKBA, but just trying to remove the misconception people have about interview.
babylondoner wrote:@rehan
how did your interview go? can you please post your interview questions?
thank you