- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Nonsense, it was not UKBA's fault whatsoever.ASIM2576 wrote:thanks for everybody who reply to my post,fault was on ukba side ,and i have to suffer,with no ill intention,i hv to suffer a lot financialy,morally and mentaly,
i m still confused to apply for visa,if all learnend member of this forum consider tht they ll not grant visa,i think then i hv to leave this or try for canda or austrila,,
in my point of view,all though it seems tough,i should go for it coz even if they refuse for previous deception reason,i will go in appeal,and there are more chances in appeal,,
uk ban me for one year to apply for uk visa,tht is over now and i think i can even apply to uk
thanks for all of you for favour
Cambridge College of Learning (CCOL) never ran a Postgraduate Diploma in Business Management course or a Postgraduate Diploma in IT course. Accordingly for a person applying for leave to remain under the Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) scheme to rely on a certificate of an award of such a diploma following a course will amount to a false representation....
In the light of the above we find that the respondent has discharged the burden of proving on the balance of probabilities that CCOL never ran its own PgDip courses in BM or IT. We further find that the period of time during which the college was ILM-accredited for the Level 7 ILM diploma in Executive Management was too short for any CCOL student to have completed that course and those who had been registered with the ILM could never have completed various requirements for its successful completion. We should add that in the end the debate about the standard of proof has proved somewhat academic, in that we are absolutely confident that even on Mr Macdonald's view of this (as being indistinguishable from the criminal standard of proof) our findings on the aforementioned matters would have been the same.
That's hilarious!ASIM2576 wrote:thanks for everybody who reply to my post,fault was on ukba side ,and i have to suffer,with no ill intention,i hv to suffer a lot financialy,morally and mentaly,
i m still confused to apply for visa,if all learnend member of this forum consider tht they ll not grant visa,i think then i hv to leave this or try for canda or austrila,,
in my point of view,all though it seems tough,i should go for it coz even if they refuse for previous deception reason,i will go in appeal,and there are more chances in appeal,,
uk ban me for one year to apply for uk visa,tht is over now and i think i can even apply to uk
thanks for all of you for favour