- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
No, it won't. Each person applying has to meet the requirements for citizenship. If you have 5 years residence and 1 year ILR, you can apply.Other confusion is, Will the same 10 yrs rule apply on us (9 dependents) who did not breach visa condition but had to leave UK due to husband?
+1. I agree with the above.CR001 wrote:No, it won't. Each person applying has to meet the requirements for citizenship. If you have 5 years residence and 1 year ILR, you can apply.Other confusion is, Will the same 10 yrs rule apply on us (9 dependents) who did not breach visa condition but had to leave UK due to husband?
It appears that he will probably be able to apply from mid 2018 for citizenship, 10 years from when he left.
CR001, is there any particular reason why you believe this would still be a problem if he applies after the 10 year period?Working in breach of visa conditions in 2007 could still be a problem though under the good character requirement.
Goes against the good character of an applicant. This aspect is likely not confined to only the last '10 years' but will be fully explored by HO particularly given that they are fully aware that he worked full time on a student visa, a clear breach and disregard for the immigration rules.cs95tdg wrote:CR001, is there any particular reason why you believe this would still be a problem if he applies after the 10 year period?Working in breach of visa conditions in 2007 could still be a problem though under the good character requirement.
I suppose assessment of Good Character is not quite clear-cut (but slightly more transparent, in terms timespan now by the introduction of the 10 year time period clause introduced in Dec 2014) and somewhat in the hands of the individual caseworker(s) looking at the immigration history. But I do see what you mean, that there is a difference between someone who wilfully attempts to deceive or evade rules/laws over short/long periods of time and others along with the reasons for doing so. The range is vast and diverse, with multiple shades of grey.CR001 wrote:Goes against the good character of an applicant. This aspect is likely not confined to only the last '10 years' but will be fully explored by HO particularly given that they are fully aware that he worked full time on a student visa, a clear breach and disregard for the immigration rules.
Sorry for putting wrong category for my husband's visa. He got re-entry as Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) not Tier 1 (General). You said that dependents will not be affected by 10 year rule. My husband visa extension was refused in Sep-2007 and from that time to Mid-2008 we were in appeals process and the appeals were unsuccessful. All of us (10 members) were having no leave to remain from mid-2007 to mid-2008. Will we (the dependents) be considered over-stayers at the time of naturalisation and 10 rule will be applied on us? Just want clarification about it. Thanks in advance!cs95tdg wrote:I suppose assessment of Good Character is not quite clear-cut (but slightly more transparent, in terms time-span now by the introduction of the 10 year time period clause introduced in Dec 2014) and somewhat in the hands of the individual caseworker(s) looking at the immigration history. But I do see what you mean, that there is a difference between someone who willfully attempts to deceive or evade rules/laws over short/long periods of time and others along with the reasons for doing so. The range is vast and diverse, with multiple shades of grey.CR001 wrote:Goes against the good character of an applicant. This aspect is likely not confined to only the last '10 years' but will be fully explored by HO particularly given that they are fully aware that he worked full time on a student visa, a clear breach and disregard for the immigration rules.
No, that's not what was said. You appear to have misunderstood. The response given was based on your input underlined below. Note that as mentioned below each individual will need to meet the requirements for citizenship in their own right. If any or all of you have a period of overstay or any other aspect where you fail to meet any of the citizenship requirements then you should take that into consideration when deciding the date to apply.wadda_laura wrote: You said that dependents will not be affected by 10 year rule.
CR001 wrote:No, it won't. Each person applying has to meet the requirements for citizenship.Other confusion is, Will the same 10 yrs rule apply on us (9 dependents) who did not breach visa condition but had to leave UK due to husband?
With respect to your immigration status while your appeals were in process, my understanding is that if the original application and any subsequent applications were made in time, before your previous leave expiring then you would be covered by section 3c/d. So the exact date when your overstay period began, would very much depend on the specifics of your applications. You may want to wait for others more knowledgeable on this to comment further.wadda_laura wrote:My husband visa extension was refused in Sep-2007 and from that time to Mid-2008 we were in appeals process and the appeals were unsuccessful. All of us (10 members) were having no leave to remain from mid-2007 to mid-2008. Will we (the dependents) be considered over-stayers at the time of naturalisation and 10 rule will be applied on us?
There is no concept of a family application for the privilege of citizenship.wadda_laura wrote:...
All of us (10 members) were having no leave to remain from mid-2007 to mid-2008. Will we (the dependents) be considered over-stayers at the time of naturalisation and 10 rule will be applied on us? Just want clarification about it. Thanks in advance!
Interesting that as a new member with only 9 posts, you've decided that the forum is a waste of time for the OP.costarica wrote:My advice is to ask Ho this questions by emailing to nationality enquirer and u get the real answer and same time send a copy of the email u will receive with ur application if they will say to u u can apply now , u r waisting ur time here
The guidance that the caseworkers use are comprehensive and quite detailed; depending on the category of breach of rules/regulations there are different time periods involved.wadda_laura wrote:We are so thankful to you nice guys for providing us so much assistance; Please let me know
...
The good character guidance does not say anything regarding the issues like this. Whenever we call home office, every time we get different answer. We are much depressed now and not finding the way out.
If u think the number of the posts make u a better adviser , this is my 3rd user name , yes is waste of time for this case and only the Ho will guarantee them advice especially if will be in writing and they are the only one who can see what's in the applicants immigration history , and no one here can do thisCasa wrote:Interesting that as a new member with only 9 posts, you've decided that the forum is a waste of time for the OP.costarica wrote:My advice is to ask Ho this questions by emailing to nationality enquirer and u get the real answer and same time send a copy of the email u will receive with ur application if they will say to u u can apply now , u r waisting ur time here
The only form of written advice HO is likely to provide is via the medium of a refusal letter.costarica wrote:If u think the number of the posts make u a better adviser , this is my 3rd user name , yes is waste of time for this case and only the Ho will guarantee them advice especially if will be in writing and they are the only one who can see what's in the applicants immigration history , and no one here can do this