- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
When his parents were married is only relevant if he was born after they last divorced.secret.simon wrote:In your case, as you claim through a British father, the pertinent question is, were your parents married at the time of your birth?
That's not quite true. Long enough residence in the UK, by either him before their birth or together afterwards, may qualify them for registration as British while they are still minors.secret.simon wrote:If yes, you are British by descent and can apply directly for a British passport (you will need proof of your father's British citizenship, and marriage records). You can not however transmit your British citizenship to any children of yours born outside the UK.
Just to clarify, what I believe Richard W means to say here is if assuming that the OP's parents were not married (an assumption), they should also have been "free to marry" (i.e. not in a marriage with other partners) at the time of his birth.Richard W wrote:When his parents were married is only relevant if he was born after they last divorced.secret.simon wrote:In your case, as you claim through a British father, the pertinent question is, were your parents married at the time of your birth?
No. I am also guilty of assuming that the father was always domiciled in England. (Possibly there is the same law throughout the UK.)secret.simon wrote:Just to clarify, what I believe Richard W means to say here is if assuming that the OP's parents were not married (an assumption), they should also have been "free to marry" (i.e. not in a marriage with other partners) at the time of his birth.
Actually...I think we may have lost their interest....noajthan wrote:Unfortunately this no longer helps OP one jot.
Again.........Casa wrote:Actually...I think we may have lost their interest....noajthan wrote:Unfortunately this no longer helps OP one jot.
Good to see you're still with us.Pm7 wrote:Hi, thanks for the replys. My parents were married when I was born but have since divorced.
So I can apply for British passport from the information you have said. Is it a straight forward process and can this be a dual passport/citizenship with my American passport
Thanks
I have nowhere near the level of knowledge that you credit me with, though I must own that I am flattered that you assume that I am that knowledgeable.Richard W wrote: was working on the principle, establish by the Legitimacy Act 1959, that if a person's parents were married at any time after his birth, then he was either legitimate or legitimated, regardless of the parents' previous marital entanglements.
We seem to have a disagreement here - you are assuming that the repeal of the Legitimacy Act 1959 by the Family Law Reform Act 1987 reversed the amendments the 1959 act made to the Legitimacy Act 1926, and so previous entanglements mattered once more. I have always understood that the Home Office followed the position of the 1959 act, though they seem at times to have simplified it to the question of whether the parents were ever married to one another at any time.
Pop into any post office and ask for a passport form.Pm7 wrote:So I can apply for British passport from the information you have said. Is it a straight forward process and can this be a dual passport/citizenship with my American passport
There is no such thing as a dual passport that I am aware of. Your American and British citizenships are completely separate thing and it's just a matter of luck that both countries allow you to possess more than one at the same time.Pm7 wrote:Hi, thanks for the replys. My parents were married when I was born but have since divorced.
So I can apply for British passport from the information you have said. Is it a straight forward process and can this be a dual passport/citizenship with my American passport
Thanks
Pm7 wrote:So I can apply for British passport from the information you have said. Is it a straight forward process[?]...
I did my own photos, and I now have the same one on my EEA DCPR, Finnish passport, British passport, and UK driving licenceRichard W wrote:The instructions about the photographs can also be stressful - I got them done professionally to avoid the stress. Fortunately, there are nowadays many shops where you can just walk in and get them taken.
Smiling is in breach of passport photo guidelines.ohara wrote:But to save a lot of time and hassle, the passport photo booths are your best bet. All you have to do is smile and make sure your head is in the circle on the screen and the machine does the rest for a few quid!
Translation required as per the guidance.Pm7 wrote:Hi, one last question if you can help. My parents marriage certificate is from the Netherlands and is in dutch but stamped by the British consulate, is this acceptable for the application or do I have to get a English version if that's possible to do.
Thanks
Got a poor steer from Wikipedia. The relevant law for most living persons whose fathers have English domicile at time of marriage is the Legitimacy Act 1976 Section 2. HO policy seems entirely consistent with that law. There may be a few problems going further back.Richard W wrote:We seem to have a disagreement here - you are assuming that the repeal of the Legitimacy Act 1959 by the Family Law Reform Act 1987 reversed the amendments the 1959 act made to the Legitimacy Act 1926, and so previous entanglements mattered once more. I have always understood that the Home Office followed the position of the 1959 act, though they seem at times to have simplified it to the question of whether the parents were ever married to one another at any time.
Always risky to use Wikipedia as a reliable reference source.Richard W wrote:Got a bum steer from Wikipedia. The relevant law for living persons whose fathers have English domicile at time of marriage is the Legitimacy Act 1976 Section 2. HO policy seems entirely consistent with that law.Richard W wrote:We seem to have a disagreement here - you are assuming that the repeal of the Legitimacy Act 1959 by the Family Law Reform Act 1987 reversed the amendments the 1959 act made to the Legitimacy Act 1926, and so previous entanglements mattered once more. I have always understood that the Home Office followed the position of the 1959 act, though they seem at times to have simplified it to the question of whether the parents were ever married to one another at any time.