- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
50A wrote:Meaning of references to being in breach of immigration laws
(1)This section applies for the construction of a reference to being in the United Kingdom “in breach of the immigration laws” in—
(a)section 4(2) or (4);
(b)section 50(5); or
(c)Schedule 1.
appears to be inconsistent with[url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/61/section/50A]50A[/url]([url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/11/section/48]4[/url]) wrote:(c) does not have leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom (whether or not the person previously had leave)
However, the instructions seemed clearInterpretation wrote:“in breach of immigration laws” means without valid leave where such leave is required, or in breach of the conditions of leave.
Annex B wrote:8.10 We should normally exercise discretion to disregard a breach of the immigration laws (i.e. a period of unlawful residence) only if there are reasons for the breach which were clearly outside the individual’s control, or the breach was genuinely inadvertent and short. Examples would include circumstances where:
...
the breach arose as a result of a late application for leave to remain where the application was submitted no more than 28 days late (or in the case of an asylum application was submitted after no more than 28 days overstaying) and was subsequently granted. We should exercise discretion to overlook longer periods between the expiry of leave and submission of application only if there are exceptional circumstances, such as a family illness or bereavement;