- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
The purpose of the Tier 1E is not for you to spend your investments on purchasing and acquiring businesses but to invest your cash in them as a director. Rules were clarified to reflect the original purpose of the route.raz93 wrote:Hi zimba,
thanks for replying, don't you think our case should not be assessed under new rule as we got our visa in 2013.
Not allowed under the current rules. Also paying someone as a 'good will 'is not technically 'investment'also we paid goodwill to previous owners to leave the property so that we can take over. We established two new limited companies each hiring new staff. Previous owners used to work themselves.
You personally purchased those properties, you are the owner not the business. That is not acceptable form of investment.raz93 wrote:What about the properties and stock bought for the business.??
It is irrelevant, If you scored points for investment initially there is NO need to score again. Please read the ruleswell we stopped that plan and invested in different businesses. please recheck my first post.
You do not get much time, you become an overstayer and subject to removalalso in worst case scenario if our extension is refused . Do we get any time to wind up everything? selling businesses and properties?
raz93 wrote:right but how can we prove that we scored points initially.??
If you were given points for investment of 200K in the initial application, you don't need to get points for investment again in the extension. When you say you were given points for investment, I hope you mean you were given points for the actual investment and NOT for having access to 200k.raz93 wrote:well when applying for initial visa we applied on the basis of a commercial property we bought on our personal names. So, bascially we claimed for investment and not available money.
I don't think they want to see the evidence of investment again. If you're no longer involved in the business in which you initially invested, they still want to see that you've been into another business but you don't need to show another investment. Go through K3 and K4 on page 41: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... _04-16.pdfraz93 wrote:yes thats right.. We were given points for the investment not access. I think HO still wants evidence as theyve written in guidance;
"134. We recognise that, as an entrepreneur, you may have moved on to other activities and no longer be involved in the business in which you initially invested, but we still require this evidence to show that the money was invested."
This is from the rules:raz93 wrote:yes thats right.. We were given points for the investment not access. I think HO still wants evidence as theyve written in guidance;
"134. We recognise that, as an entrepreneur, you may have moved on to other activities and no longer be involved in the business in which you initially invested, but we still require this evidence to show that the money was invested."
Go See table 5 & 6 in Appendix A here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration ... attributesThe applicant will not need to provide evidence of this investment as specified in 46-SD (a)-(d) if he was awarded points for it, as set out in Table 5, in his previous grant of entry clearance or leave to remain as a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) Migrant.
That is correctQ1. If you get points awarded for INVESTMESTMENT in your initial application, you don't need to award points again while applying for extension?
Yes, investment proven once is enough. However rules allow HO to question you again on your investment under the 'genuine entrepreneur test'. You should be able to show that you fully invested money in that business and did not use it in such a way that was unacceptable.Q2. Is it valid even though you have moved on to a different business since?