- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
It would save time if you simply explained your situation.n8net wrote:Hi,
I have been doing some research on settlement routes to partners of settled (ILR) persons and naturalised British Citizens when making in country applications. (not from outside UK)
I have been reading a lot of material and asking in the forum, but still I am not sure, so hope someone can answer the following qustions.
1) what are the differences in req. for spouse applicants if their partner is ILR holder or British Citzen ? £18,600 p.a minimum income level + English language the same for both
2) I understand that, any one can settle on their own
a) if they have been a partner for 5 years (given initial visa was issued after July 2012, if not it is just 2) Not if the relationship has ended.
b) if they have been on any visa for 10 yrs am I corrrect ? Yes if there are no gaps in legal residence.
3) what category spouse needs to meet 3 years ? There is no 3 year spouse category for ILR
I really hope if some one can summarise these different routes and the req.
thanks
None. Both ILR holders and British citizens are persons settled in the UK.n8net wrote:1) what are the differences in req. for spouse applicants if their partner is ILR holder or British Citzen ?
Such a person can apply to settle. it is not automatic, unlike PR for EU citizens.n8net wrote:2) I understand that, any one can settle on their own
a) if they have been a partner for 5 years (given initial visa was issued after July 2012, if not it is just 2)
b) if they have been on any visa for 10 yrs
This posts asking advice for his 'friends' or sometimes, hypothetical questionsCasa wrote:The 3 year rule has already been explained to you clearly by CR001 in this thread:
http://www.immigrationboards.com/britis ... l#p1455480
n8net wrote:so what I take away from these answers is, no matter if u r native BC or a naturalised migrant, the spouse has to spent minimum 5 years as their partner to be eligble..and other requirement, (especially English Language) they need to meet (5yrs) is same.... is this correct ? correct
also, for this 5 yr requirement that should be met by the majority of the spouses (post 2012), is any time spent on other visas count ? or is it just the dependant visas (including PBS dependant and ILR dependant) ? No, it must be either 5 years PBS dependent OR 5 years Spouse Settlement. No visa combinations for 5 years ILR route.
thanks
This part is very important. If you switch from being PBS dependent to an ILR dependent/FLR(M) route, your clock is reset to zero. This switch is voluntary except if the PBS holder gets ILR based on ILR(LR) rather than the PBS route, in which case it is mandatory.CR001 wrote:also, for this 5 yr requirement that should be met by the majority of the spouses (post 2012), is any time spent on other visas count ? or is it just the dependant visas (including PBS dependant and ILR dependant) ? No, it must be either 5 years PBS dependent OR 5 years Spouse Settlement. No visa combinations for 5 years ILR route.
Generally, but not always. The requirements, especially absence, but also good character, are different for ILR and naturalisation.n8net wrote:since only 3 yrs is needed for BC, this means when a spouse gets ILR, he/she automatucally qualifies for BC as well?
The 3 year rule for citizenship as the spouse of BC applies to ALL applicants if they are married to a British citizen, regardless of when they applied for their spouse/dependent visas. The FAQs is correct.n8net wrote:also based on the discussions above, mods could you please update the lock thread
http://www.immigrationboards.com/britis ... 95747.html
Q2. to reflect the fact that it is only applicable to Pre July 2012 ONLY pls.. it is confusing to people like me and gives misleading info..
also given it was posted in 2016, this should have been corecetd there and then ?