- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix
1) Probably a typo. You may contact them if you wish, or you can include a covering letter that points out the typo.Nutmeg wrote:Hi all,
I applied for UK naturalisation at the end of January at the Camden (London) NCS. I just received a letter asking for additional evidence. I have a couple questions about it:
1) The letter says I should provide the additional info by the 10th of March. I hope it's a typo, since the letter is dated 27/3 and the case report says it's pending to the 10/4, but should I contact the HO about this?
2) The information requested is evidence of residence in the UK from January 2016 (when I got my PR document) to January 2017. They ask for original documents. Now, when I applied I included as proof of residence a letter from my university saying I will be a full time student until September 2018. So do you have any idea why they would want additional evidence about that year? And also, should I send more than 1 document just in case?
My hope is that since they only requested one specific thing the rest of the application is fine
Thanks for the help!!
There's no penalty for sending too many documents. If I were you I would send a mountain of evidence, not only 1-2 documents Both official and "unofficial", from letters from university and letters from employers to bank statements, bills, tenancy agreements, Student Finance Letters, (legalized) copy of student ID, letters from doctors / NHS etcAnd also, should I send more than 1 document just in case?
The simple (and probably correct) answer is that they were not satisfied with the evidence you sent As long as you now send solid evidence, you will probably not have any issues.Nutmeg wrote:Thanks for the answer!
I will probably send everything I have, at this stage. I hope they have gone through the rest and that was the only issue, since I guess otherwise they would have rejected it
Anyway, the evidence I sent was a letter from my university (copied by the NCS) stating that I will be a full-time student until September 2018. What I found peculiar is that that letter covers a period that goes from September 2015 to September 2018, and for the previous year I provided a similar kind of evidence (I've always been here as a student), but they only asked for additional evidence for the period from January 2016 to January 2017. Do you have any idea of what this may be due to?
Regards
Well there lies the problem. The letter is not sufficient evidence that you actually attended University. That letter merely states your status at that moment in time and your intentions. I think the request for extra evidence is justified.Nutmeg wrote:The letter was from October 2015.
salmintin wrote:Well there lies the problem. The letter is not sufficient evidence that you actually attended University. That letter merely states your status at that moment in time and your intentions. I think the request for extra evidence is justified.Nutmeg wrote:The letter was from October 2015.
Now from your second post:
1) I do not know too much about CSI and whether it is (legally) required or not if you are a student, however remember that you no longer need to exercise treaty rights after you become permanent resident.
2-3) I would send ALL documents you mentioned + anything else I may find at home. You know first hand that it's easy to make a bad judgement and send the wrong documents. This is probably your last chance. Send everything.