- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, Administrator
Very good example of not doing the Step 2 in my earlier post. Check the smallest detail. The CW does not have the discretionary right to correct the applicant's spelling mistake. It is easier for the CW to reject than to write in to ask for clarification (which would be better for that particular applicant but possibly lead to delays in processing other applicants).Manu_cal wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:03 pmYes how the application should be presented is described very well by marcnath but having said that there are plenty of refusals based on very small missing information and some people had that experience where the HO never bothered to ask for additional documents. I can relate to one where one of my employees wanted to show her employment to extend her partners visa. Her initial application was refused as saying that the name of the company is misspell and a genuine company would not do that so her employment is not genuine. I gave her some of my regulatory documents of the company and her second application was successful. So what would you say in this case .
She spelt it correctly the first time also. I can't put the name here just an example say I wanted to register my company as I am for you Ltd. But that name was taken so I choose I m 4 u Ltd. The name was correct just the Highly qualified Case worker pre assumed without doing a simple Google search that the company is not genuine because it has a funny name.marcnath wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:34 pmVery good example of not doing the Step 2 in my earlier post. Check the smallest detail. The CW does not have the discretionary right to correct the applicant's spelling mistake. It is easier for the CW to reject than to write in to ask for clarification (which would be better for that particular applicant but possibly lead to delays in processing other applicants).Manu_cal wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2017 4:03 pmYes how the application should be presented is described very well by marcnath but having said that there are plenty of refusals based on very small missing information and some people had that experience where the HO never bothered to ask for additional documents. I can relate to one where one of my employees wanted to show her employment to extend her partners visa. Her initial application was refused as saying that the name of the company is misspell and a genuine company would not do that so her employment is not genuine. I gave her some of my regulatory documents of the company and her second application was successful. So what would you say in this case .
I assume your employee spelled the company name correctly in the second application, which I would attribute to the reason for success rather than the additional documents.
Advice given here has been consistent with that. ONLY send documents required in the rulesoh dear moderators.. sometime life seems so easy and the visa extension easier, when you guys re-iterate the fact to send only the required documents. I am sure that's the right way !
ALL of the refusals based on genuineness have happened after months of HO investigation and detailed interviews. They never had anything to do with documents submittedHowever, world goes upside down when one sees so many visa rejections and specially where the applicant is awarded all the points but visa refused due to things like genuine entrepreneur test.