Post
by Amber » Thu Aug 17, 2023 1:59 am
Assuming your child has no recourse to public funds, you claiming child benefit would not affect your wife’s ILR as she didn’t claim public funds, whether it affects your child, is more of a grey area, as I’ll explain:
There is a qualification in the rules which says:
“(i) a person (P) is not to be regarded as having…. recourse to public funds merely because P is (or will be) reliant in whole or in part on public funds provided to P’s family sponsor unless, as a result of P’s presence in the UK, the family sponsor is (or would be) entitled to increased or additional public funds …” (other than tax credits)
A failure to observe a condition attached to permission to stay, such as ‘no recourse to public funds’, has immigration consequences. It can be grounds for cancelling (curtailing) leave and for deportation under s.10(1) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 — and can be a criminal offence. You would be rightly concerned by this. However, the claimant is not the child it is the parent, in your case a parent who is not subject to immigration control. Therefore, arguably, there is not a breach of the NRPF condition attached to your child’s permission to stay by claiming because you are not the person with the condition.
Personally, I have never known any case where a child with NRPF has had their permission to stay in the UK cancelled because a benefits claim has been made by a parent who was eligible to claim. Therefore, i do not think you have anything to worry about.
**this forum is not intended to be a substitute for professional advice**
Click
here to send me a PM regarding an offensive post.
Do NOT PM me for immigration advice.