ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

10 Year Long Residence: Dependants. Para 322[1], EX 1(a) (b)

Only for queries regarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR). Please use the EU Settlement Scheme forum for queries about settled status under Appendix EU

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
kb_leeds
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:19 pm

10 Year Long Residence: Dependants. Para 322[1], EX 1(a) (b)

Post by kb_leeds » Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:32 pm

Hi

Everybody in my family (myself and my two dependants -- Wife and Child) completed 10 years 2012 November (legal and continuous) and we applied for ILR in March 2013 using the then form SET(O). We made a mistake in assuming that all three could apply using the same form. We paid fees for Main applicant + two dependants rather than three full applicant fees. Hindsight is a great thing!

Now, while I was granted ILR last week, the family has been refused the same under para 322(1) of HC395. Instead they have been given leave to remain under exceptions paragraph EX 1(a) and 1(b).

I approached an immigration lawyer who has suggested that the home office has done the right thing and the case is "complicated" but the family can apply in their own right as they have each completed 10 years.

The question is: is it a simple case of the wife and daughter reapplying separately using SET(LR) and SET(F)? Does anybody have any experience in this and can they throw some light?

Thanks in advance.

Regards
KB

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33343
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:18 pm

Yes. Cite the Long residence Guidance, page 11.
Once an applicant has built up a period of 10 years continuous lawful residence there is no limit on the length of time afterwards when they can apply.
If daughter was born in the UK, then, alternatively, she is entitled to register for British citizenship.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

kb_leeds
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 6:19 pm

Post by kb_leeds » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:18 am

vinny wrote:Yes. Cite the Long residence Guidance, page 11.
Once an applicant has built up a period of 10 years continuous lawful residence there is no limit on the length of time afterwards when they can apply.
If daughter was born in the UK, then, alternatively, she is entitled to register for British citizenship.
Thanks Vinny. No, she wasn't born in the UK. So it is SET(LR) and SET(FR) for the wife and daughter respectively. I was unsure as the letter addressed to them while refusing ILR says "you are not entitled to appeal this decision".

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 33343
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 pm

Post by vinny » Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:33 am

There's no right of appeal as they have been granted leave. Suggest that your wife applies for SET(LR) first and then your daughter applies for SET(F) after your wife is successful.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Locked