- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Include evidence of subsisting marriage when apart.[url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chapter-8-section-1spouses]Chapter 8, section 1: spouses[/url] > Chapter 8: Family members transitional arrangements, section 1, spouses wrote:4.6. Absences from UK during probationary period
There is no specific requirement in the Rules that the entire probationary period must be spent in the United Kingdom. For example, where an applicant has spent a limited period outside of the United Kingdom in connection with his employment, this should not count against him. However, if he has spent the majority of the period overseas, there may be reason to doubt that all the requirements of the Rules have been met. Each case must be judged on its merits, taking into account reasons for travel, length of absences and whether the applicant and sponsor travelled and lived together during the time spent outside the United Kingdom. These factors will need to be considered against the requirements of the Rules.
Thanks vinny,vinny wrote:Include evidence of subsisting marriage when apart.[url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/chapter-8-section-1spouses]Chapter 8, section 1: spouses[/url] > Chapter 8: Family members transitional arrangements, section 1, spouses wrote:4.6. Absences from UK during probationary period
There is no specific requirement in the Rules that the entire probationary period must be spent in the United Kingdom. For example, where an applicant has spent a limited period outside of the United Kingdom in connection with his employment, this should not count against him. However, if he has spent the majority of the period overseas, there may be reason to doubt that all the requirements of the Rules have been met. Each case must be judged on its merits, taking into account reasons for travel, length of absences and whether the applicant and sponsor travelled and lived together during the time spent outside the United Kingdom. These factors will need to be considered against the requirements of the Rules.
hi vinny
is satisfied.287(a)(i)(d) wrote:the applicant was admitted to the UK or given an extension of stay as the spouse or civil partner of a Relevant Points Based System Migrant; and then obtained an extension of stay under paragraphs 281 to 286 of these Rules and has completed a period of 2 years as the spouse or civil partner of the person who is now present and settled here; or
Because we went to India for treatment purpose for her pregnancy and she was luckily conceived there. She was coming back with me but on the day travelling she was sick, so she could not travel back with me and doctor advised seven month bed rest, after that around 8months we blessed with a baby. Again making new Indian passport 2 months and than baby visa 3 months baby visa.vinny wrote:is satisfied.287(a)(i)(d) wrote:the applicant was admitted to the UK or given an extension of stay as the spouse or civil partner of a Relevant Points Based System Migrant; and then obtained an extension of stay under paragraphs 281 to 286 of these Rules and has completed a period of 2 years as the spouse or civil partner of the person who is now present and settled here; or
She has to also show that the marriage is subsisting and you both intend to live permanently with each other, etc.
Compare these latter two requirements to FLR(M) (284). Are they similar? I think that she may have to satisfy practically these same requirements for FLR(M) as well.
Do you have good reasons why she was absent for so long?
Thanks Vinny,vinny wrote:Given good reasons for her absence and evidence of subsisting marriage, I think that she stands a good chance for SET(M).
Thanks a lot casaCasa wrote:You can go with your wife, in fact you will be expected to attend, otherwise you would have to submit a letter explaining your absence. There will be no problem taking your child with you.
Hi Vinny,baba_baba wrote:Hi guys,
I have not heard anything from home office yet... I am not sure whether they will respond to my email. In worst come worst scenario, we may have to apply through new system (5 years long wait). I just want to clarify this, maybe this is already discussed in many places in this website before. My wife will be starting a new job in November and by the time she apply for FLR (M), she will have 7 months salary paid into her account. She will be earning £19K gross and I don't earn much. I run my own business and earn £9.5K gross per annum. Are we going to have any problem in just showing my wife's salary, rather than showing mine and her (£19K + £9.5K)? I am worried that the visa officer takes my salary and ignore her salary, in that case it is below the threshold.
As my experience with home office is not very good, they made two fatal mistakes in my wife case. Also, if we are solely depending on her salary of £19K and I take child benefit and it comes to my bank account. Is this going to have any negative impact. As I still have some time left and I can correct things if they are not right.
I again apologise for confusing post and repeated questions, I just want to make sure we don't give any chance to home office to jeopardise our chance of getting ILR.
Thanks in advance ..
Hi Vinny,vinny wrote:It appears to be a general response.
Thanks Vinny..vinny wrote:It appears to be a general tautological response.
Immigration applicants cannot rely on telephone calls with Home Office.baba_baba wrote:I spoke to home office, and the adviser clearly said that she will have to wait for 5 years before applying for her indefinite. He was saying even though she came to the UK before the rules changed, she switched to spouse visa in 2013 and she will come under new rules.
Well done! Really pleased for you both and thanks for updating us.sq wrote:SPECIAL THANKS TO VINNY AND CASA
This board save my money and time.
Hi SQ here, my wife SET (M) application is been accepted and approved ILR on 287 (a)(i)(d) basis. So we went to croydon office on window, all paper work done by myself no solicitor help, within 2 hours they grant us ILR visa.
Once again thx to all moderator
SQ
Great news, congratssq wrote:SPECIAL THANKS TO VINNY AND CASA
This board save my money and time.
Hi SQ here, my wife SET (M) application is been accepted and approved ILR on 287 (a)(i)(d) basis. So we went to croydon office on window, all paper work done by myself no solicitor help, within 2 hours they grant us ILR visa.
Once again thx to all moderator
SQ