Eea misinterpretation by Ukba
Posted: Mon Aug 12, 2013 6:59 pm
Hi all,
I submitted eea2 application for my mom and after 2 weeks my mom received COA WITH NO RIGHT TO WORK. I contacted Ukba as my mom was applying as a dependant on me and my wife (eea national). We provided my wife's eea passport, proof of excercising treaty right, marriage cert and my birth certificate proving that my mom is my mother( which make her a direct family mother in ascending line, parents and grandparents). Also provided proof of dependency, money remittance for over a year from my wife and me as she does not work. As the COA had no rigt to work I emailed them pointing them to the relevant eea regulations and today I got a reply from one of d bosses Daren
After taking advice from our technical staff, they confirm - if your son was applying at the same time as yourself, you would be treated as a ‘direct family member’ through your son’s application, but as you are applying as a single applicant you are treated as a ‘direct family member’ of the EEA national but as the Mother-in-Law you are an ‘extended family member’, and therefore the ‘short COA’ was correct.
Regards
Darren
I already obtained my eea residency 3yrs ago. So why should my mom apply the same time as me to be treated as direct family member
I have emailed them again to explain to me how the tech staff got his own interpretation of d eea reg. as the word mother inlaw seems to confuse them now they treat my mom as extended family member.
Plz dear board what it's your opinion on this issue
I submitted eea2 application for my mom and after 2 weeks my mom received COA WITH NO RIGHT TO WORK. I contacted Ukba as my mom was applying as a dependant on me and my wife (eea national). We provided my wife's eea passport, proof of excercising treaty right, marriage cert and my birth certificate proving that my mom is my mother( which make her a direct family mother in ascending line, parents and grandparents). Also provided proof of dependency, money remittance for over a year from my wife and me as she does not work. As the COA had no rigt to work I emailed them pointing them to the relevant eea regulations and today I got a reply from one of d bosses Daren
After taking advice from our technical staff, they confirm - if your son was applying at the same time as yourself, you would be treated as a ‘direct family member’ through your son’s application, but as you are applying as a single applicant you are treated as a ‘direct family member’ of the EEA national but as the Mother-in-Law you are an ‘extended family member’, and therefore the ‘short COA’ was correct.
Regards
Darren
I already obtained my eea residency 3yrs ago. So why should my mom apply the same time as me to be treated as direct family member
I have emailed them again to explain to me how the tech staff got his own interpretation of d eea reg. as the word mother inlaw seems to confuse them now they treat my mom as extended family member.
Plz dear board what it's your opinion on this issue