LPR (EEA3/4) and comprehensive sickness insurance
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:56 pm
Hi there I am hoping someone can help with our (rather complicated) immigration issues. I am a non-EEA spouse of an EEA citizen and in June of 2013 the HO confirmed our application for EEA1 and EEA2, which we obtained in July of 2013. We are now both eligible for EEA3/4 legal permanent residency and now next month my EEA spouse is eligible for naturalisation because by then he will have been here 6 years (all of which he was exercising his treaty rights). I see that it is much easier to apply for naturalisation once you have your permanent residence card (EEA3) to support your naturalisation application so I was just looking at what was involved for that and it looks as though we have a problem:
He would be applying to confirm his legal permanent residency (which, as I understand he automatically has after being in the UK for a continuous 5 year period and exercising treaty rights so it is just a matter of HO confirming that status) as a student. This basis for LPR requires documenting that you were covered under comprehensive sickness insurance for the 5 years as a student. We do not have this and am not sure how we got the EEA1/2 in the first place without it. Here was our situation when we first got our residency confirmed in 2013-
At the time of application we purchased CSI to cover both of us from WPA which lasted from June 2013 to June 2014. So we had CSI at the time of application but the coverage did not extend the full three years for the period we were applying for. So for EEA3/4 do we just need to document CSI at the time of application or do we need to show coverage for the continuous 5 year period? If our experience with EEA1/2 is anything to go by then it is just at the time of application. Or do different rules now apply for EEA3/4?
Or is it something else entirely. We have a complicated immigration status. We are both Americans. But my husband has an ROI passport (which he got under birth rights legislation but thats not really important other than the fact that he has never lived or worked in ROI and therefore cannot get an ROI EHIC card as far as im aware- if he could, this would be so much simpler and we wouldnt have to worry about CSI at all). But he entered the UK under a Tier 4 visa so that he could study and i joined him as a Tier 4 dependent partner (a visa which no longer exists). During that time as a student he got his ROI passport, i was able to work legally, and then when he graduated in July 2013 I supported him financial while he was looking for work. So at the time of our EEA1/2 applications it was made under the economically self sufficient basis for exercising treaty rights.
Now that we are both PhD students we hope to make our LPR applications on the basis of him being a student. I just dont know what to do about the CSI requirement. I have seen that this only applies for people who became students after June 2011. Is this correct? If so, we could show that since he started his study in July 2009. But between July 2013 and January 2014 he was not a student and was economically self sufficient (which was accepted by virtue of being granted EEA1/2) so i dont know if this break now means that him starting his PhD in January 2014 now does not make him exempt from CSI requirement since it is after 2011. If this exemption exists at all because in other places i say the exemption is the date of application for EEA3/4 rather than the date of becoming a student.
If that whole route is a non starter than i wonder if CSI was ever required at all since we are American students studying in the UK- we originally had Tier 4 visas to enter the country and are now remaining legally in the country under EU regulations but as far as the University is concerned (and student loans) we are paying the international tuition rate as Americans. Non-EU students are not required to purchase private health insurance and can access the NHS. We only ever bought the CSI to support our application in the first place because he didnt need it as an American students and I didnt need it as someone who was making NHS contributions. So can we argue that this requirement does not apply? It does seem counter-intuitive though since the whole purpose of the legislation was so foreigners wouldnt use the NHS so I imagine that argument saying that we are insured under the NHS would fail just by that logic.
If that doesnt work then what if we just purchase the CSI again. Having the coverage at the point of application (rather than for the whole residency period you are applying under) seemed to work for the EEA1/EEA2 but maybe that was an oversight on the previous judgement?
And, if they are bothered by not having it for the whole 5 year period continuously- does that then mean we have to wait ANOTHER 5 years to be able to apply?? That would be a problem for me then when my current EEA2 expires in 2018 and i have to reapply because i can imagine not having the CSI coverage for the required length of time and would be a VERY real hinderance in gaining employment and crossing borders in the future (i know its not compulsory to have a valid one but having one that is not expired just makes life easier).
So that is a very long way of me asking: Does my spouse need CSI for his EEA3 application if applying as a student but dual national as American? And if yes, Does it have to cover retrospectively and contiuously for the entire 5 year period? Or will that 1 year that we had coverage be taken into account and we only have to wait 4 more years to apply?
Any help would be very very very appreciated. I fear we may need to pay for legal advice.
He would be applying to confirm his legal permanent residency (which, as I understand he automatically has after being in the UK for a continuous 5 year period and exercising treaty rights so it is just a matter of HO confirming that status) as a student. This basis for LPR requires documenting that you were covered under comprehensive sickness insurance for the 5 years as a student. We do not have this and am not sure how we got the EEA1/2 in the first place without it. Here was our situation when we first got our residency confirmed in 2013-
At the time of application we purchased CSI to cover both of us from WPA which lasted from June 2013 to June 2014. So we had CSI at the time of application but the coverage did not extend the full three years for the period we were applying for. So for EEA3/4 do we just need to document CSI at the time of application or do we need to show coverage for the continuous 5 year period? If our experience with EEA1/2 is anything to go by then it is just at the time of application. Or do different rules now apply for EEA3/4?
Or is it something else entirely. We have a complicated immigration status. We are both Americans. But my husband has an ROI passport (which he got under birth rights legislation but thats not really important other than the fact that he has never lived or worked in ROI and therefore cannot get an ROI EHIC card as far as im aware- if he could, this would be so much simpler and we wouldnt have to worry about CSI at all). But he entered the UK under a Tier 4 visa so that he could study and i joined him as a Tier 4 dependent partner (a visa which no longer exists). During that time as a student he got his ROI passport, i was able to work legally, and then when he graduated in July 2013 I supported him financial while he was looking for work. So at the time of our EEA1/2 applications it was made under the economically self sufficient basis for exercising treaty rights.
Now that we are both PhD students we hope to make our LPR applications on the basis of him being a student. I just dont know what to do about the CSI requirement. I have seen that this only applies for people who became students after June 2011. Is this correct? If so, we could show that since he started his study in July 2009. But between July 2013 and January 2014 he was not a student and was economically self sufficient (which was accepted by virtue of being granted EEA1/2) so i dont know if this break now means that him starting his PhD in January 2014 now does not make him exempt from CSI requirement since it is after 2011. If this exemption exists at all because in other places i say the exemption is the date of application for EEA3/4 rather than the date of becoming a student.
If that whole route is a non starter than i wonder if CSI was ever required at all since we are American students studying in the UK- we originally had Tier 4 visas to enter the country and are now remaining legally in the country under EU regulations but as far as the University is concerned (and student loans) we are paying the international tuition rate as Americans. Non-EU students are not required to purchase private health insurance and can access the NHS. We only ever bought the CSI to support our application in the first place because he didnt need it as an American students and I didnt need it as someone who was making NHS contributions. So can we argue that this requirement does not apply? It does seem counter-intuitive though since the whole purpose of the legislation was so foreigners wouldnt use the NHS so I imagine that argument saying that we are insured under the NHS would fail just by that logic.
If that doesnt work then what if we just purchase the CSI again. Having the coverage at the point of application (rather than for the whole residency period you are applying under) seemed to work for the EEA1/EEA2 but maybe that was an oversight on the previous judgement?
And, if they are bothered by not having it for the whole 5 year period continuously- does that then mean we have to wait ANOTHER 5 years to be able to apply?? That would be a problem for me then when my current EEA2 expires in 2018 and i have to reapply because i can imagine not having the CSI coverage for the required length of time and would be a VERY real hinderance in gaining employment and crossing borders in the future (i know its not compulsory to have a valid one but having one that is not expired just makes life easier).
So that is a very long way of me asking: Does my spouse need CSI for his EEA3 application if applying as a student but dual national as American? And if yes, Does it have to cover retrospectively and contiuously for the entire 5 year period? Or will that 1 year that we had coverage be taken into account and we only have to wait 4 more years to apply?
Any help would be very very very appreciated. I fear we may need to pay for legal advice.