Clarification on COA w/o right to work for unmarried partner
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 9:28 am
Hi all,
I've been reading through all the threads I can find on the technicalities on getting a COA without right to work as an unmarried partner. I wanted to make sure I've interpreted these properly and don't somehow jeopardise my standing while my application is being processed.
I'm a Canadian with a German unmarried partner, currently waiting on a decision for a Residency Card. I arrived on an EEA Family Permit which expires in December. I started the RC application last month and should get the COA decision soon I think.
I'm assuming that because I am an unmarried partner I am unlikely to get a COA with a right to work confirmed. This is based on what I've read around here even though this FOI response seems to suggest that unmarried partners with a family permit SHOULD in fact get a right to work.
Right now I am working as a research associate in what is basically a consultancy role. My employer doesn't require that I be in the UK to work and have never asked for any proof of right to work here. So, what I want to confirm is:
1. Assuming I get a COA without right to work, this does not invalidate my right to work under my Family Permit, which is valid until mid-December, correct?
2. The second point, on which I'm less sure, if my employer has no view on my right to work in the UK (i.e. they won't terminate my contract if I have no confirmation of right to work), can I continue working here as a consultant after my Family Permit expires, even though my COA does not confirm my right to work? Info I'm finding here seems a bit contradictory on this point. It's important for me because I will likely be coming in and out of the UK in that period and don't want to be refused entry into the country at some point. From what I can understand, I should be able to continue working because I retain the status established under my Family Permit until a decision is reached on my RC. However, I want to make sure I'm not misinterpreting that point.
Thanks to anyone who can help me confirm (or correct) my assumptions here!
I've been reading through all the threads I can find on the technicalities on getting a COA without right to work as an unmarried partner. I wanted to make sure I've interpreted these properly and don't somehow jeopardise my standing while my application is being processed.
I'm a Canadian with a German unmarried partner, currently waiting on a decision for a Residency Card. I arrived on an EEA Family Permit which expires in December. I started the RC application last month and should get the COA decision soon I think.
I'm assuming that because I am an unmarried partner I am unlikely to get a COA with a right to work confirmed. This is based on what I've read around here even though this FOI response seems to suggest that unmarried partners with a family permit SHOULD in fact get a right to work.
Right now I am working as a research associate in what is basically a consultancy role. My employer doesn't require that I be in the UK to work and have never asked for any proof of right to work here. So, what I want to confirm is:
1. Assuming I get a COA without right to work, this does not invalidate my right to work under my Family Permit, which is valid until mid-December, correct?
2. The second point, on which I'm less sure, if my employer has no view on my right to work in the UK (i.e. they won't terminate my contract if I have no confirmation of right to work), can I continue working here as a consultant after my Family Permit expires, even though my COA does not confirm my right to work? Info I'm finding here seems a bit contradictory on this point. It's important for me because I will likely be coming in and out of the UK in that period and don't want to be refused entry into the country at some point. From what I can understand, I should be able to continue working because I retain the status established under my Family Permit until a decision is reached on my RC. However, I want to make sure I'm not misinterpreting that point.
Thanks to anyone who can help me confirm (or correct) my assumptions here!