- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
tabhar2000 wrote:have over 19 yrs of experinace out of which 8 yrs in saudia....4 yrs as specilist role senior engineer with present employer
have attached job description also but was not sign and stamped just print out...
may be they are not happy with that....
and two experinc certficates just on letter haed with sign and stamp...for my past employer
they gave me zero for experiance...
education claimed 25 got 25 and past earnings claimed 25 scored 25..total =50
now how to get claim....through review request...
pls advise
have got job from UK offer letter was also attached...
tabhar2000 wrote:pantaiema would pls advise me how to justify my past experinace...
i have submitted present employer letter along with my jiob description....as well as experince certificates/letters from my pas 2 employers......orignal
i donot know why they did not consider all these documents....
now advise me how can i make my case string by justification on review request with out producing nay new documnets.....
with same old documenst already with Ho...is it possible for me to justify...
my position........my all positions presnet and in past are graduate level...engineering positions.
Clealry you won't get points for thishave attached job description also but was not sign and stamped just print out...
Did these "experience" letters have detailed job responsibilities ??? If yes, then does this experience with previous employer(s) enough (in duration) to get you the min. 25 points ?? If so, this should be your point of arguement with regards to your review.and two experinc certficates just on letter haed with sign and stamp...for my past employer
That should be acceptable.if the job description was on separate letter from the employer reference letter (which does mention that), is that ok?
That COULD be a potential problem. In my office, letter heads are available as if they are paper tissues - anyone and everyone has access to them !! So the chances are that anyone can print anything on themThe description is on official letterhead but not signed or stamped.
Then how can you think it possible that this is a valid evidence as per HSMP standard - the most precious bit (detailed job description) was missingpast experiance's certificates fro two copmanies, which i have submitted was signed and stamped in stendard format with out any job description details in it.
The attachement (job description) ... was it on a letter head? If it was, then this might have been acceptable, although signatures would have made it better. But if this attachment was on a plain paper, for HSMP evaluation it is again of no value unless endorsed by employer.Present employer's certifcates was also signed and stamped but attachemnt of job description was not signed....