- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Your leave to remain has been granted outside the normal immigration rules and therefore you can claim public funds (providing your visa does not state No Recourse to Public Funds).bahwe wrote:Hi
granted last week Limited leave to remain outside immigration rules. Received recently BRP. On the card it doesn't mention that I have no recourse to public funds and the paper that explain the decision to grant LTR and my status it says among other rights that I can approach the job centre to look for work or claim benefits. I am aware that people with LTR r under immigration control and have no recourse to public funds. But when looking at my BRP and paperwork I feel confused! Help plz
bahwe wrote:Thanks for the reply. I have been browsing the internet.for 2 days but could only find about LTR and no recouse to public funds according to New regulations. If u could plz direct me to a link about LTR outside the immigrati.on rules with recourse topub funds
my other question: In ILR application form an applicant has to metion if was in receipt of any benefits whilst on limited leave. To my understanding claiming benefits would make ILR application unsuccessful. My question: will.it still be unsuccessful even if the applicant had the right to claim benefits while on LTR ?
Answers would b much appreciated
As your leave to remain does not have a condition of no recourse to public funds you are not subject to immigration control. Also, people who have LOTR are generally exempt from the habitual residence test for benefits.Section 119 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 wrote:
(9)“A person subject to immigration control” means a person who is not a national of an EEA State and who—
(a)requires leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom but does not have it;
(b)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom ;
(c)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom given as a result of which is subject to a condition that he does not have recourse to public fundsa maintenance undertaking; or
(d)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom only as a result of paragraph 17 of Schedule 4.
The old DLR (I assume your case) did allow applicant's to claim public funds and work. However, the new DLR (no longer family life issues) is indeed a 10 year route to settlement (old DLR was a 6 year route) and does not allow the applicant to claim public funds (generally) but they can work. The new family route is also a 10 years route to settlement (4 x 2.5 year visas).bahwe wrote:Thank u again!
I'm intrigued as I was granted Limited leave To remaIn outside the immigration rules and from what I have been reading DLR for 3 years that enabled people to claim benefits is not being issued anymore. Instead there is LTR for 30 months without recourse to pub funds.
I was on legacy as failed asylum seeker. Been in the country for 12 years and have two kids one is 12 naturalized British on his 10th birthday and the young one who is nearly 10 was granted as my dependent LTR. My caseworker thought that I don't fall under art8 according to him I dont meet all the requrements but decided to grant me LTR on a discretionary basis.
LOTR is different and is applied at the discretion of the caseworker and can still be granted and allow the applicant to claim public funds. If you want to be certain for your own peace of mind just give the ukba a call and ask them.bahwe wrote:Although my case Was on legacy and pending for years it has been decided in accordance with the New rules. And according to the New rules people granted LTR r under immigration control. I could not thus find anything within the New rules about LTR outside the immigration rules with recourse to pub funds. I'm beginning to wonder if they made a mistake while issuing the BRP and forgot to mention no recourse to public funds!
D4109125 wrote:bahwe wrote:Thanks for the reply. I have been browsing the internet.for 2 days but could only find about LTR and no recouse to public funds according to New regulations. If u could plz direct me to a link about LTR outside the immigrati.on rules with recourse topub funds
my other question: In ILR application form an applicant has to metion if was in receipt of any benefits whilst on limited leave. To my understanding claiming benefits would make ILR application unsuccessful. My question: will.it still be unsuccessful even if the applicant had the right to claim benefits while on LTR ?
Answers would b much appreciatedAs your leave to remain does not have a condition of no recourse to public funds you should be entitled to public funds. Also, people who have LOTR are generally exempt from the habitual residence test for benefits.Section 119 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 wrote:
(9)“A person subject to immigration control” means a person who is not a national of an EEA State and who—
(a)requires leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom but does not have it;
(b)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom ;
(c)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom given as a result of which is subject to a condition that he does not have recourse to public fundsa maintenance undertaking; or
(d)has leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom only as a result of paragraph 17 of Schedule 4.
If you are not subject to immigration control (for the purpose of public funds) it will not affect your ILR application if you claim public funds.
Out of curiosity may I ask why you were granted LOTR? Was this Discretionary Leave to remain (DLR)?