- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Most unfortunate.blackpearl108 wrote:Hi board, my problem gone bad to worse.
...
If your client still wishes to become a BC a fresh application will need to be made. Any fresh application will be decided on the basis of enquiries carried out at that time.”
Now what do i have to do to get out of this and how much time do i have from the date of this refusal le
JR for what exactly? The MN1 refusal was correct. A child born abroad needs ILR. You failed at the reconsideration too.blackpearl108 wrote:hi board any more suggestions any thing better than FLR FP e.g SET F or JR and like I said how many days do I have to do any next submission like is it 28 working days which is normally the case. thanks
You applied under 3(1) of BNA which is at Home Secretary's discretion.blackpearl108 wrote:hi board any more suggestions any thing better than FLR FP e.g SET F or JR and like I said how many days do I have to do any next submission like is it 28 working days which is normally the case. thanks
Well the MN1 was refused and the reconsideration was also a refusal. Sad when people don't take advice and then lose out like this. Of course the solicitor probably made his money off an application that was doomed to fail. ILR for children born abroad, though costly, is so necessary to avoid situations like this and now the poor child has no visa and the overstay against their name.noajthan wrote:You applied under 3(1) of BNA which is at Home Secretary's discretion.blackpearl108 wrote:hi board any more suggestions any thing better than FLR FP e.g SET F or JR and like I said how many days do I have to do any next submission like is it 28 working days which is normally the case. thanks
That' s the thing about discretion its discretionary.
To avoid creating precedents case by case, HO follows guidance to decide how to apply this discretion (on behalf of HS);
the outcome was quite predictable and unsurprising.
There is no appeal and no evidence process was not followed, so no grounds for reconsideration.
Unclear what you think JR could achieve.