It may have been more complicated if they were wrongly granted the child benefit
(i.e. when the exceptions did not apply). Then, they would have had to pay it all back
I agree with CR001
. They didn't receive the child benefit (as asked in question 5.5
Therefore, they did not violate 245HE.
(d)(i) nor 319D.
(b)(i), in relation to child benefit. End of story.
This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links
for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.