ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

CSI for EEA3 application prior to 2006 (Exercising Treaty)

Use this section for any queries concerning the EU Settlement Scheme, for applicants holding pre-settled and settled status.

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
dilon
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:34 am

CSI for EEA3 application prior to 2006 (Exercising Treaty)

Post by dilon » Sat May 14, 2011 12:40 pm

Hi all,

I am EEA student from Netherlands I was doing BSc degree course from Sept 2005- Sept- 2009 (4 years course) I had a grant for my course fee cover 4 years. And I was financial support myself by doing a full time job since then.

This means I was self-sufficient . I'm also doing MSc full time course from Jan-2010 until July -2011 which I paid course myself ( I lived and work continuous in UK since Sept- 2005 until now)

I did applied for Permanent Resident which I supplied many documents, however, UKBA send me a letter required Comprehensive Sickness Insurance I don't have one since I was using NHS services for ground of being EEA full time student. I was not even aware in 2006 the rules was changed for EEA student that required CSI.

They asked me additional documents:
Evidence of Exercising Treaty Right in UK min of 5 years (continuous five year period)

1) My question is this, this is only rule affect people who come after July-2006? Since I was not even informed. Do I need to show them CSI in my situation?

2) They want proof of univeristy study from Sept-2009- Sept-2010, which will complete 5 years. Meanwhile, I sent them university letter confirm that my course start Sept-2005 to Sept- 2009 when I was graduate. Again letter showed I started MSc course in Jan-2010 to July-2011, this means it was a gap of 6 months between July -2009 - Jan-2010. Then, to cover that gap period of 6 months I produced to them the P60, and pay slips which show my presence in UK to cover continous 5 years.

Please advise on this issue, what should I do?

Thanks

fysicus
Senior Member
Posts: 767
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 10:04 am
Location: England
Netherlands

Post by fysicus » Sat May 14, 2011 2:53 pm

To be honest, I am not aware of any practical benefit of Permanent Residence for EU citizens. I would simply not bother in your situation.

dilon
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:34 am

Post by dilon » Sat May 14, 2011 3:14 pm

fysicus wrote:To be honest, I am not aware of any practical benefit of Permanent Residence for EU citizens. I would simply not bother in your situation.
Thank for your reply, I understand what you mean, but I just want to know my entitlement as EAA resident in this case. Since I have been a student and working continuous full time for 5 years as well as paying NI (which contribute to NHS) for 5 years. Why should they asked me to provide CSI?

I find to be very inappropriate.

fysicus
Senior Member
Posts: 767
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 10:04 am
Location: England
Netherlands

Post by fysicus » Sat May 14, 2011 5:23 pm

If you have been working for five years, then mark yourself as a worker on the application form and not as a student (even if that was your main activity and primary reason for being in the UK), and just supply the evidence for being a worker (employee).

dilon
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:34 am

Post by dilon » Sat May 14, 2011 5:28 pm

fysicus wrote:If you have been working for five years, then mark yourself as a worker on the application form and not as a student (even if that was your main activity and primary reason for being in the UK), and just supply the evidence for being a worker (employee).
Thanks, I think this is a good idea and that clarify the matter, should I still need to provide them with CSI?

fysicus
Senior Member
Posts: 767
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 10:04 am
Location: England
Netherlands

Post by fysicus » Sat May 14, 2011 5:48 pm

No, of course not, for an employee that is not required. Just supply the necessary evidence, nothing more.

dilon
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:34 am

Post by dilon » Sat May 14, 2011 6:00 pm

fysicus wrote:No, of course not, for an employee that is not required. Just supply the necessary evidence, nothing more.
Thanks a lot

Locked