- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator
Same here... Post was signed on Feb 28 by them. I've called them twice since then, managed to get a confirmation over the phone that my passport is with them and the case is in process. But that's it, they are not willing to give any more update. I think our cases are of the lowest priority to them among all the applications cos we don't pay a penny...dba_kkk wrote:Hi All,
Did any body else managed to contact home office?
did any body recieved passports back?
My update still not yet
cheers
dba_kkk
The above instruction now applies to all (economic) immigration categories.ILR - counting continuous period in the UK wrote:Applications that fall short of the five year continuous period
In some cases, applicants may have been granted five years continuous leave, but will not have spent five years continuously in the UK before their current leave expires.
Caseworkers may count the period between entry clearance being granted and the date the applicant entered the UK towards the five years, provided this period was not longer than three months.
This is a very great welcome relief.sushdmehta wrote:If any of the HSMP JR covered migrants are falling short of "qualifying residential period for settlement" because their arrival was delayed by not more than 3 months from the date EC became effective (EC issue date) - then they need not send their passports to UKBA for error correction.
The above instruction now applies to all (economic) immigration categories.ILR - counting continuous period in the UK wrote:Applications that fall short of the five year continuous period
In some cases, applicants may have been granted five years continuous leave, but will not have spent five years continuously in the UK before their current leave expires.
Caseworkers may count the period between entry clearance being granted and the date the applicant entered the UK towards the five years, provided this period was not longer than three months.
Hi Sush:sushdmehta wrote:The 28 days provision is only to be used from the anniversary of date of entry (overseas applicants) / issue date of leave to remain (in-country applicants).
In such cases, one may not be able to take advantage of the 28 days allowance when applying in-person. But you may apply by post.
Thanks alot! Muchas Gracias!! Obrigado!!! Merci Boku!sushdmehta wrote:Apply before your current leave expires (not necessarily 28 days before) and request consideration under the given instruction in the IDI.
Whether or not you wish to get the error corrected is entirely your choice, but there is no need to do so anymore.
Also, if one is interested to only apply in-person on the very first day he is allowed to do so (28 days before) and unable to wait a bit longer to apply nearer to the date of expiry, then it might be wise to get the error correction done ... to avoid any complications.
For HSMP JR protected migrants there is a legal provision for UKBA to correct the errors but for other economic migrants there is none. This instruction extends the same benefit to all.
olawest wrote:Finally, what does IDI mean?
Immigration directorate instructions wrote:The immigration directorate instructions (IDI) are internal guidance for our staff on the handling of applications.
1:1 if applying in-person. In a cover letter if applying by post. If the form has a "additional information" section, mention it there for sure - irrespective if you apply by post or in-person.olawest wrote:How do one make reference to the IDI in communication with UKBA.
I do not want to create confusion here but where does it specify that this provision applies to all categories? It only mentions that this applies to cases where "continuous leave of five years was granted". I thought this means work permit holders who are given a five year leave to remain at the outset?sushdmehta wrote:If any of the HSMP JR covered migrants are falling short of "qualifying residential period for settlement" because their arrival was delayed by not more than 3 months from the date EC became effective (EC issue date) - then they need not send their passports to UKBA for error correction.
The above instruction now applies to all (economic) immigration categories.ILR - counting continuous period in the UK wrote:Applications that fall short of the five year continuous period
In some cases, applicants may have been granted five years continuous leave, but will not have spent five years continuously in the UK before their current leave expires.
Caseworkers may count the period between entry clearance being granted and the date the applicant entered the UK towards the five years, provided this period was not longer than three months.
The current revised notice applies to all categories listed in the document.rkc wrote:I do not want to create confusion here but where does it specify that this provision applies to all categories? It only mentions that this applies to cases where "continuous leave of five years was granted". I thought this means work permit holders who are given a five year leave to remain at the outset?sushdmehta wrote:If any of the HSMP JR covered migrants are falling short of "qualifying residential period for settlement" because their arrival was delayed by not more than 3 months from the date EC became effective (EC issue date) - then they need not send their passports to UKBA for error correction.
The above instruction now applies to all (economic) immigration categories.ILR - counting continuous period in the UK wrote:Applications that fall short of the five year continuous period
In some cases, applicants may have been granted five years continuous leave, but will not have spent five years continuously in the UK before their current leave expires.
Caseworkers may count the period between entry clearance being granted and the date the applicant entered the UK towards the five years, provided this period was not longer than three months.
Tier 1 settlement guidance (Annex B -> 2.2).rkc wrote:I do not want to create confusion here but where does it specify that this provision applies to all categories? It only mentions that this applies to cases where "continuous leave of five years was granted". I thought this means work permit holders who are given a five year leave to remain at the outset?