ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Employee name (Start date) [ End date] {Hourly rate paid} (Part time)
Dear marcnath,marcnath wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 7:03 amok. What were the monthly salaries before and after the wage change ?
The way the CW would have calculated hours is by dividing the wage on FPS by 7.5. So, it would have showed lesser number of hours that you expected before March 2017.
But, since you were much more than the 130 required, it may not have been the reason.
Unfortunately, we are on a guessing game as the refusal text you gave is not clear enough and we don't know the exact documents you submitted.
If you have copies of all the documents you submitted, double check that you have not missed anything,
If everything is in order, I can't see it as anything other than a CW error
Respected Gurus ,
Thanks Marcnath, i will do the same as you described abovemarcnath wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 5:58 pmThe hours on payslip is irrelevant since the job table has only one hourly pay.
However, even if 7.50 is used throughout, you will still be over 130 hrs/month combined.
Just do the calculations in your AR month by month
e.g.
Aug 2016 - Employee 2 (51.84 hrs) + Employee 3 (99.84 hrs) - Total 146.68 hrs, which is greater than 30 hrs/week.
Do that for all the 12 hours and make clear you are using 7.5 as that is what you entered wrongly in the job table, but the numbers would be higher if actual hours in payslip are followed.
The start date with business only needs to be filled in if it is different from start date in job (which I assume you filled) .Leeee704 wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:28 pmThanks Marcnath, i will do the same as you described abovemarcnath wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 5:58 pmThe hours on payslip is irrelevant since the job table has only one hourly pay.
However, even if 7.50 is used throughout, you will still be over 130 hrs/month combined.
Just do the calculations in your AR month by month
e.g.
Aug 2016 - Employee 2 (51.84 hrs) + Employee 3 (99.84 hrs) - Total 146.68 hrs, which is greater than 30 hrs/week.
Do that for all the 12 hours and make clear you are using 7.5 as that is what you entered wrongly in the job table, but the numbers would be higher if actual hours in payslip are followed.
i have gone through policy guide again again and cant see anything about jobe title .
and also on policy guide there are some examples for how to fill application form which have cleared the confusion of job title only thing is coming in to my mind is following i did not filled this section in my application.
start date with your business ( if this differs from satrt date in job)
marcnath wrote: ↑Fri May 04, 2018 7:57 amappriciate your help marcnath i will keep this point in my mindLeeee704 wrote: ↑Thu May 03, 2018 11:28 pmThe start date with business only needs to be filled in if it is different from start date in job (which I assume you filled) .
Since the refusal letter did say "title", you should also address that and state that the immigration rules has no requirement that the two jobs need to have the same Job Title. (I still think they meant total and made the typo, but you should address it anyway)
Hi Marcnath ,marcnath wrote: ↑Wed May 02, 2018 5:58 pmThe hours on payslip is irrelevant since the job table has only one hourly pay.
However, even if 7.50 is used throughout, you will still be over 130 hrs/month combined.
Just do the calculations in your AR month by month
e.g.
Aug 2016 - Employee 2 (51.84 hrs) + Employee 3 (99.84 hrs) - Total 146.68 hrs, which is greater than 30 hrs/week.
Do that for all the 12 hours and make clear you are using 7.5 as that is what you entered wrongly in the job table, but the numbers would be higher if actual hours in payslip are followed.
I meant this one, but starting April 2016
There was another recent refusal posted here where the HO specifically mentioned the reason was that both part-time jobs did not have the same title.Leeee704 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 23, 2018 10:33 pmHi dear gurus ,
Time line
Applied my intial application for tier1 in july 2014
21 august 2014 got approval
August 2017 applied for tier1 extension .
recieved cmplex letter in oct 2017
sent letter and called home office for updates in april 2018
IHS refund after 1 week of contacting HO
Recieved refusal after a week of IHS refund (today)30 April by temporary migration Team #
sent Admin review on 11 May
rcieved email from Home office on 8 jun (which was 28th day) saying further delays and they will confirm it on 22 jun.
again 22 jun saying to wait for another 2 weeks.
my concern wording of their email is
we are curentaly making further enquriries regarding your application . we are currently awaiting for the outcomes of those enquiries.
has any one experinced this kind of delays in Admin rview before ?
I don't have the link to that post at hand.Leeee704 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:21 pmthanks for reply marcnath
yes i have seen that post his refusal wording was alsmost same.
any idea what happned with that case?
can you copy the link of that post if possible
do you think after Suceesful admin review HO can again come up with some thing else or asking for further
docoments ?
Have unlocked and combined the posts againLeeee704 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 11, 2018 12:41 pmDeaar Gurus i am starting a new topic as old topic is been loacked by admin as they thout that is end of my case.
My Admin review for tier 1 Ent extension is been succeeded
my admin review says as follow,
you application for leave to remain has been returned to the original case working team for reconsideration.
a new decision will be made on your application and you will be informed of the outcome. if your application is refused you will be entitiled to apply for fressh admin review of the decision.
your existing leave and conditions of leave are extended under sec 3c of the 1971 immigration act while your application is under consideration.
ADMIN REVIEW : NOTIFICATION OF OUTCOME
we have carefully considered the points that you raised in your admin review. we have withdrrawn the orignal decision because we have found that the orignal decision maker made an error when considring your application.
we have returned your leave to remain application for reconsideration and a new decision will be made. we are unable to correct the error because reconsideration is outside of the remit of administrative review.
now is HO going to send me my biometrix or is still my case pending as i need to book my holidays ?
any sggestion please ?
