- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
jeet420 wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:58 pmThank you so much for your reply!
I also have another question regarding RLMT. I am on a tier-4 visa and still the company said they are required to go through the RLMT. I told them that according to the latest official documents, I don't need a RLMT as I am already on a tier-4 visa. However, they said they took help from an immigration specialist company in order to see how they can make a case for my sponsorship and because my job is not on the shortage occupancy list, they have been advised to go through the RLMT.
I have not come across anyone switching from tier-4 to tier-2 who had to go through RLMT. Should i be worried? They have already started the RLMT so there isnt much i can do but i am just trying to find out the answers to my questions for my own satisfaction.
Any expert comments would be appreciated thanks!
That makes no sense at all. They don't need to run the RLMT because you are switching from Tier 4. This is confirmed in paragraph 78B of Appendix A of the immigration rules.
Yes. If they wrongly think they need to run the RLMT, and they do not complete it by the end of your Tier 4 leave, you will not be able to switch within the UK only by applying in your home country.
Very weird. They are just plain wrong about this.
Members are not permitted to name employers or sponsors on the forum please.
Ah okay, all clear. Sorry, I had no idea. I normally stick to the Tier 4 forum where sponsors are very often mentioned.
No worries. Universities can be mentioned no issue but employers and tier 2 sponsors not as that is far more specific.
The company was of course correct first time. The so-called expert doesn't know what they are talking about and should be ignored.
They have messed that up too. They must mean a "new entrant" who can be paid the lower salary level in the code of practice. All Tier 4 to Tier 2 applicants qualify for the new entrant rate, with no restrictions on age or experience. As with the RLMT and the Shortage Occupation list, it is only those applying outside the UK where age is relevant. Someone applying in their home country needs to be under 26 and/or recruited via the university milk round in order to be a "new entrant". Even then, previous experience is not relevant either way. See Table 11CA in Appendix A:
You need to check this with the HR. They will know their own deadlines and schedules. It sounds like you will need to be ready to leave the UK by the end of this month if necessary.
1. From my personal experience, hiring managers generally don't have knowledge of immigration rules (unless they themselves on some visa category). They are completely dependent on HR team and especially HR personnel who deal with immigration/visa applications. Even these HR personnel are not experts and they are unable to keep up with the rule changes and often confused about RLMT, rCoS/uCoS, skill levy, etc. So your hiring manager can't do much apart from escalating further up their international mobility team.jeet420 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2020 2:43 pmI did raise this whole issue directly with the hiring managers ( they were the most senior people I could reach out to as I had just been communicating with their recruiter about the whole visa issue) and I shared all the government documents with them which clearly states I don't need RLMT. The hiring managers apologized for the delay and said they are trying their best to sort out my visa with their 'international mobility team'.
And then a 2-3 days later I got a call from the recruiter explaining to me that they would have to go through the RLMT.
The job ( as part of the RLMT) is advertised till 15th Jan. My visa expires by Jan end. Do you think they would be able to apply for my tier-2 visa before my tier-4 visa expires? This is if in case I pass the RLMT and they give me a formal job offer.
I wonder if it's just an excuse to brush me away and not straight away say no to me but I don't see any reason why they can't just give me a straight no instead of dragging me into this whole RLMT because at the end of the day, the job was offer only verbal in nature.