A few additional thoughts, as I was reflecting on this on my way home.
bravopapa wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 6:24 pm
In France, there is no concept of otherwise than by descent or descent, you just pass the citizenship indefinitely to future generation.
True of many countries. I believe that Italy and Poland allow automatic citizenship by indefinite generations of descent. Which is why so many Americans attempt to trace their ancestry to an Italian or Polish ancestor. Effectively a multi-generation EU passport.
By contrast, the UK prefers its citizens to have strong residential links to the home countries (England, Wales, Scotland and NI). Even Ireland allows automatic inheritance of citizenship only to one generation abroad, with any further generations requiring registration with the FBR to acquire Irish citizenship.
On a different note, the 1980s saw many Commonwealth countries (the UK, Canada, Australia, India and possibly New Zealand) tighten their citizenship laws.
Till the late 1980s, anybody born in India was an Indian citizen automatically (pure
jus soli). In 1986, the law was amended to require that at least one parent must be Indian for a child born in India to be an Indian citizen. In the early 2000s, that was further tightened to require that not only must one parent be an Indian citizen, but that the other parent must not be illegally resident in India. So it is not just the western countries tightening their citizenship laws.
To the best of my knowledge, Pakistan and Cambodia are the only two countries in the Old World to still practice pure
jus soli (anybody born there is a citizen, regardless of parentage).
bravopapa wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 6:24 pm
God knows what the future will be like but clearly being a British Citizen and living abroad does not present any advantages as far as i can see.
Not when it comes to things like access to resources in the UK.
Then again, keep in mind that the UK still affords Commonwealth citizens who are resident in the UK on any non-visit visa the right to vote. And a Commonwealth citizen with ILR has almost all the rights of a British citizen within the UK (their children born in the UK will be British citizens, they can vote in all elections and even be elected to the Commons or appointed to the Lords, etc).
Differences between a Commonwealth citizen with ILR and a British citizen may arise outside the UK, but within the UK, they have almost all the same rights, with possibly fewer rights only when it comes to avoiding deportation in case of major crimes.
The UK's immigration and citizenship system is strongly oriented towards long-term residency within the UK, rather than having generations of citizens abroad who have no direct residential/live-in connection with the UK.
And it is not just the UK that is concerned about migrants doing the bare minimum to acquire British citizenship and then leaving the UK to return to their country of origin. It was a
political question in Canada in the 2000s as well.