Immigrationboards.com

fatimahh wrote:This should be made a Sticky!!! so easy to understand Thanks for sharing

Jambo wrote:If you are in the process of a Surinder Singh route and still abroad, I suggest you read this post about changes in the regulations that intend to make it harder to do a "quick & dirty" Surinder Singh route. You might wish to apply for a EEA Family Permit now to benefit from the transitional arrangements which will be in place for people who applied before the changes come into effect (January 2014).

65 wrote:Similar argument was considered in Kamila Santos Campelo Cain. There a British national and his unmarried non-EEA national partner had three children, one of whom was born when he was exercising Treaty rights in Spain and Portugal over a two year period. It was argued that, whereas regulation 9 of the EEA Regulations did not apply to unmarried partners of British nationals, there was no distinction in principle which could be made between married and unmarried partners. The Upper Tribunal (Haddon-Cave J and Judge Kopieczek) accepted that the exercise of the right of free movement was as likely to be affected by the inability of a durable partner to reside with the EEA national as it would be were his or her spouse to be denied residence status. It accepted at paragraph 39 that the Surinder Singh principle does extend to persons such as the appellant who are in a durable relationship. I agree with this conclusion. It seems to me that Surinder Singh must now be read in the light of any new rights arising from the Directive, such as those benefiting family members falling within Article 3.2.

vinny wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 09, 2018 11:43 pm

See also Home Office's response regarding dual nationals?

utahsaint wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 20, 2022 3:26 pm

Surinder Singh’ Route to Close On 29 March 2022