Post
by Obie » Thu Aug 28, 2014 6:22 pm
OP a case could be mounted based on legitimate expectation, in regards to the provision of national law.
A residence document simply confirms and not confer rights . It is inconsistent with EU law for people who had residence document to be awarded a greater rights than people who do not, when EU law and even UK law, makes applying for those document optional.
The most sensible way for the Home Office to have done it, was to say all those who had residence in the UK as a Student prior to 2011 will have their time as student counted as lawful residence as the NHS covered them, but any time spent as student afterwards, will not be counted , as the people are aware that the concession does not exist.
It is a reasonable deduction for people who entered prior to the 2011 changes that the UKBA considered the NHS as a cover, which is why they did not include this requirement.
Had people knew, they would most certainly have obtained it.
Further more, it follows from Royers that the permit was optional, it cannot be proportionate or lawful to deny lawful residence retrospectively, when these people thought and it was the Home Office policy to treat them as lawful.
Smooth seas do not make skilful sailors