- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Do we (sort of!) agree? There is no real grey area, in this case the OP (or proxy) cannot work or provide any business services whilst on a Fiancee visa?Obie wrote:The above will inform the decision below.[b]Paragraph 41 of the Immigration Rules[/b] wrote: 41.
(iii)does not intend to take employment in the United Kingdom; and
(iv)does not intend to produce goods or provide services
within the United Kingdom,including the selling of goods or services direct to members of the public; and
I am of the view that there is no grey area.[b]Appendix FM[/b] wrote:Section D-ECP: Decision on application for entry clearance as a partner
D-ECP.1.1. If the applicant meets the requirements for entry clearance as a partner the
applicant will be granted entry clearance for an initial period not exceeding 33 months, and
subject to a condition of no recourse to public funds; or, where the applicant is a fiancé(e) or
proposed civil partner, the applicant will be granted entry clearance for a period not exceeding 6
months, and subject to a condition of no recourse to public funds and a prohibition on
employment.
MPH80 agrees with me, as you seem to with the quotes you gave, I don't understand why you digress, anyway...Obie wrote:Well i must say about 4 contributor share the same view, only one has a dissenting view, and giving your track recording on the forum over the years Wanderer, i may be inclined not to give much weight to it, but then again we live in a democratic state.
OP you can choose to go with the Majority, or you can go with Wanderer, i think the call is entirely yours.
In my experience i have never seen an Immigration officer, raiding an individual computer to see if they have been working overseas.
You've not even read the question properly Obie so how can what you say be taken seriously? Please repost when you have, read the thread fully.Obie wrote:I am saying 100% that it is okay.
Your wife is not taking any employment in the UK.
It is clear she will be prohibited from doing that.
Again, slothful cognition, do keep up, where is employment mentioned? OP (or proxy by dint) is freelance, i.e. self-employed, i.e. a business. And doing so on a Fiancé visa which is expressly forbidden.Obie wrote:I don't understand how a person who works for a US company, undertakes a work for a US company, can be classified as having taken employment in the UK, simply because she happens to be physically present in the UK.
I am a proud Guardian Reader, as mentioned in you previous edited. I also read mail and Telegraph and the express, notwithstanding the fact that i don't accept their views.
Ok, my sabbatical didn't last long!Obie wrote:Well Wanderer I am not up for a fight either.
In regards to MHP80 that you mentioned, i will simply provide the link below.
Whether i say wife or fiance, or Girlfriend, is immaterial.
The question is whether an offshore employment will be considered as having taken up employment in the UK.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... s-wrk24--2
True - I was trying to use it as an analogy. I just confused the situation more.Wanderer wrote: Irrespective of the morals/value/reasoning for the above, it's not the case for the OP/OP Proxy.....
I know, I compiled my response during your reply, thread got mixed up a bit...MPH80 wrote:True - I was trying to use it as an analogy. I just confused the situation more.Wanderer wrote: Irrespective of the morals/value/reasoning for the above, it's not the case for the OP/OP Proxy.....