- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Summary: I am working here for more than 6 years ago. All my papers, payslips, P60s, etc, included my referees are fine, except this little annoying shortage of the WRS.Q6: I'm an EEA national from A8 country. I never registered with WRS and the scheme has been abolished in 2011. Can I still apply for naturalisation?
Under EEA regulations, EEA nationals from the new joiners in 2004 (the A8 countries) were required to register with the HO within 30 days of starting employment (there were exemptions in certain cases). This scheme was abolished in April 2011. It was the responsibility of the employee to register.
If you never registered, then your employment years can't be counted as lawful under the EEA regulations and will not lead to PR and British citizenship. This means that your 5 years for PR (and 6 years for BC) started in May 2011 (when the scheme was closed). You should be able to apply for naturalisation in 2017.
Please list offences including date of offence and appeal/court decision.EU2015 wrote:Ok this worries me.. I got my licence suspended for 6 months after driving without proper insurance (it was my wifes car, long story) I also have 2 speed camera tickets.. this was a year ago, I appealed but lost and had to pay. I do not have a criminal record of any kind.
I haven't yet sent the paperwork, is this something I should mention? will it automatically disqualify me?
thanks
akhurshid wrote:Please list offences including date of offence and appeal/court decision.EU2015 wrote:Ok this worries me.. I got my licence suspended for 6 months after driving without proper insurance (it was my wifes car, long story) I also have 2 speed camera tickets.. this was a year ago, I appealed but lost and had to pay. I do not have a criminal record of any kind.
I haven't yet sent the paperwork, is this something I should mention? will it automatically disqualify me?
thanks
akhurshid wrote:If you apply before 3 years of court decision, your application will be automatically refused.
You can apply after 3 years of court decision. You'll need to declare the convictions. Still no guarantee that your application will be approved due to offence history but if no further offence is committed between now and time of your application, it will go in your favour.
akhurshid wrote:No worries.
If you do decide to go ahead with application, make sure you declare them else not only you'll be refused, you'll be banned from applying for 10 years. HO has access to this information at their finger tips!
jumpstart17253 wrote:Hello Guys,
With the grace of Allah, I got my ILR approved today.
This may help someone.
Submitted CRB Check and PNC check (both were clean)
Also put a printout of Part 9 of immigration rules, and highlighted
the text that says that the Criminal conviction should be recorded
for refusal.
Also put a printout from http://www.drivingban.co.uk where they mention
totting up ban is not considered a criminal offence and is not recorded
as it is not an arrestable offence.
Also included a persoanl letter to caseworker, stating why i chose to
apply; and referenced the above information so they can refer to it
quickly.
was called in around 10:30 and the woman said all is fine with my
application and a BRP will follow in next 10 days.
Thanks to amber and everyone else for their time and expert advice.
So anybody out there with 2 speeding fines and 1 Driving without insurance in last 24 months and your CRB and PNC comes clean
give it a try you might get approved like I got today.
Thanks immigrationboards and the members.
akhurshid wrote:That does not apply to you. If you appeal against an FPN and it is upheld, that is considered as non custodial sentence which means application will be refused for 3 years.
Hi one quick question, what about if some one appeal against a PCN to council and if council rejects the appeal which is usually always the case. Will the person also be considered guilty (no court is involved here) And if PCN is paid after initial rejection of appeal from council without going to PATAS. Will it be fine or need to wait as for FPN appeal rejection in court.akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
Hi one quick question, what about if some one appeal against a PCN to council and if council rejects the appeal which is usually always the case. Will the person also be considered guilty (no court is involved here) And if PCN is paid after initial rejection of appeal from council without going to PATAS. Will it be fine or need to wait as for FPN appeal rejection in court.akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
Hi one quick question, what about if some one appeal against a PCN to council and if council rejects the appeal which is usually always the case. Will the person also be considered guilty (no court is involved here) And if PCN is paid after initial rejection of appeal from council without going to PATAS. Will it be fine or need to wait as for FPN appeal rejection in court.akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
akhurshid wrote:Yeah but OP has an FPN and court uplheld it so 3 years ban.
Any word on your reconsideration request?
Nice Serina, Congratulations.Serina26 wrote:Finally got a reply from HO. My reconsideration has been successful after an 8-month battle. I can't believe that the HO employs such a an incompetent bunch of people (caseworkers), who don't even know the definition of a conviction/ non custodial sentence. Worse, the HO provides such a bad quality training to its staff. My immigration journey is now over, at last! Thank you to everyone on here. My advice would be: if you feel the wrong decision has been made on your application, don't give up; challenge it and keep fighting. Good luck to all those awaiting a decision.
Serina
congrats. Goes to show the system isn't always right and common sense should prevail.Serina26 wrote:Finally got a reply from HO. My reconsideration has been successful after an 8-month battle. I can't believe that the HO employs such a an incompetent bunch of people (caseworkers), who don't even know the definition of a conviction/ non custodial sentence. Worse, the HO provides such a bad quality training to its staff. My immigration journey is now over, at last! Thank you to everyone on here. My advice would be: if you feel the wrong decision has been made on your application, don't give up; challenge it and keep fighting. Good luck to all those awaiting a decision.
Serina