- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
takfly wrote:Subject:
When I was an infant, my parents changed my immigration status
from the "Indifinite Leave to Remain in the UK (ILR)" with my
original nationality to the "Rregistration of British Citizen".
As I understand that case, ILR didn't exist because of deception used to obtain it.52. Ms Naik, in oral submissions, said that a British citizen who is also a citizen of
another country would, in practice, retain his or her indefinite leave to remain
“stamp” in the passport of that other country. Whilst that may be so (we express
no view), the continued physical presence of a stamp in a foreign passport cannot
be taken to govern the interpretation of the 1971 Act. We reiterate that it is
incoherent with the legislation to assume indefinite leave to remain can remain
extant, in the case of a person who is a British citizen, or that, without express
statutory provision, such leave automatically reappears on deprivation of that
citizenship.
I have highlighted the judge's point of view in that paragraph, as opposed to counsel's. I think in this case, the law is uncertain/unclear. I doubt the HO would be compenent to advise, though they should certainly be more qualified than this forum. I have a feeling that the OP is going to generate an interesting test case.akhurshid wrote:As I understand that case, ILR didn't exist because of deception used to obtain it.52. Ms Naik, in oral submissions, said that a British citizen who is also a citizen of
another country would, in practice, retain his or her indefinite leave to remain
“stamp” in the passport of that other country. Whilst that may be so (we express
no view), the continued physical presence of a stamp in a foreign passport cannot
be taken to govern the interpretation of the 1971 Act. We reiterate that it is
incoherent with the legislation to assume indefinite leave to remain can remain
extant, in the case of a person who is a British citizen, or that, without express
statutory provision, such leave automatically reappears on deprivation of that
citizenship.
I would advise OP to contact HO to get it clarified.
See below section 1(1) that has been quoted above:46. As can be seen, the general provisions in the 1971 Act regarding leave to enter and remain are expressly stated not to apply where a person is a British citizen. We do not consider that it is compatible with the scheme of that Act to regard indefinite leave to remain (or any other sort of leave) as having some sort of vestigial existence, whilst the person concerned remains a British citizen. A person cannot be both a British citizen and concurrently subject to indefinite leave to remain. Upon becoming such a citizen, the appellant became a person to whom section 1(1) applied. As Mr Deller put it, the appellant’s indefinite leave to remain simply ceased to exist.
The part that is missing from your example here is the renunciation. She must actually go through that process. And I don't know if the UK would allow it in this case. Simple loyalty to their parent's nationality, even if she has perhaps never even been to that country? Maybe. I wouldn't count on it, but let's assume they would, especially as there are young people realistically in this situation. There is still a fundamental difference here from your situation. That person was born in the UK. As long as that is the case, and they have never had any other kind of visa since relinquishing citizenship, that person is allowed to remain in the UK indefinitely. If they did have some kind of visa previous to becoming British and subsequently want to go on to get ILR, I'm not completely sure, but I don't see any technical reason why not. As long as they are sincerely making the UK their permanent home, I think it would be reasonable.takfly wrote: Another case I can imagine of:
She/he was born in the UK from foreign national parents.
Some countries allow dual nationalities (UK and her/his parents' native nationality) for those babies
upto the certain age (18 yers or 20 yers old, I guess), even if they basically do not allow dual nationality.
When those baies get to the designated age, they are ordered to give up one of the nationalities.
If they chose the foreign national when they feel strong loyalty to their parents' nationalty,
but want to stay in the UK for certain reasons, like education, job, whatever, can she/he get
the ILR on her/his foreign national passport?
Fair questions, but given such hue and cry about immigrants "taking over" they might be happy to "kick one out" without much hassle lolouflak1 wrote: Also, what are your reasons for wanting to renounce? The UK will ask. They have a right to know. If it's tax purposes or legal reasons, you can probably forget about it happening. But if it because you have lived outside of the country most your life anyway, or will be doing so shortly and have no need, then they will likely let you do it. Is it something else altogether? Is is religious?
Well that's the thing though isn't it? He doesn't want to be kicked out. He wants to stay! I think the discussion must initially focus on whether the UK would even allow renunciation in the first place. I don't think they would.fwd079 wrote:... but given such hue and cry about immigrants "taking over" they might be happy to "kick one out" without much hassle lol
I don't think this will be accepted as a valid reason to renunciate, and in any case, they will require more than just business ties. They want foreign citizenship.fwd079 wrote:But I believe however, that takfly can show business activities in the country of their choice to just say sorry no UK cultural/economic life for me?