- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Cool mind - did you get a response to your question, perhaps from elsewhere? If so, would you mind sharing? I suppose your question is about how best this can be represented on the form without appearing to be 'overworking'. E.g. a student who is only allowed to work 20 hours a week and is registered with multiple agencies. The student picks work from these various agencies depending on how the work comes, but ensures that he/she stays within the 20 hours a week limit. I suppose all agencies would have to be included under the period in question, making it seem like the student worked many hours???cool mind wrote:How about if a person doing 2 zero hour part time jobs then should the both need to write or one. If two jobs then where the 2nd job should write??
Nope its not that mean. My mean that if presently someone doing two part time jobs but on the form the space is for one job then whether need to write one job or both??ScopeD wrote:Cool mind - did you get a response to your question, perhaps from elsewhere? If so, would you mind sharing? I suppose your question is about how best this can be represented on the form without appearing to be 'overworking'. E.g. a student who is only allowed to work 20 hours a week and is registered with multiple agencies. The student picks work from these various agencies depending on how the work comes, but ensures that he/she stays within the 20 hours a week limit. I suppose all agencies would have to be included under the period in question, making it seem like the student worked many hours???cool mind wrote:How about if a person doing 2 zero hour part time jobs then should the both need to write or one. If two jobs then where the 2nd job should write??
Thanks Cool Mind. I can't find Universal Soldier's comment about students working. Would you be able to provide me with a link?cool mind wrote:Nope its not that mean. My mean that if presently someone doing two part time jobs but on the form the space is for one job then whether need to write one job or both??ScopeD wrote:Cool mind - did you get a response to your question, perhaps from elsewhere? If so, would you mind sharing? I suppose your question is about how best this can be represented on the form without appearing to be 'overworking'. E.g. a student who is only allowed to work 20 hours a week and is registered with multiple agencies. The student picks work from these various agencies depending on how the work comes, but ensures that he/she stays within the 20 hours a week limit. I suppose all agencies would have to be included under the period in question, making it seem like the student worked many hours???cool mind wrote:How about if a person doing 2 zero hour part time jobs then should the both need to write or one. If two jobs then where the 2nd job should write??
About students then read universal soldiers comments who is 2000% right because its not to check number of hours. And students were allowed working especially when semester break, next semester waiting, writing thesis, course completion, summer vacation and much more when can work full time.
ScopeD wrote:Nope its not that mean. My mean that if presently someone doing two part time jobs but on the form the space is for one job then whether need to write one job or both??
About students then read universal soldiers comments who is 2000% right because its not to check number of hours. And students were allowed working especially when semester break, next semester waiting, writing thesis, course completion, summer vacation and much more when can work full time.
Don't worry Cool Mind. I found the comment. Thanks.Thanks Cool Mind. I can't find Universal Soldier's comment about students working. Would you be able to provide me with a link?
fn286 wrote:Hi
I think limited company directors are not considered as self employed. They will have to tick Director on the form. People like sole traders are self employed and need self assessment details from HMRC.
I couldn't find any document or guide where it says limited company directors have to provide HMRC tax record. Also, please can anyone confirm since when limited company directors will have to provide proof of NI contributions? What if a person no longer a limited company director but was at the time of Tier 1 extension only and got ILR on the basis of permanent employment?
Does this effect applications made before April 5?
Thanks.
gaganjyot wrote:Do I have to provide self employed details as well or only when I was employed
Bc4indian wrote:fn286 wrote:Hi
I think limited company directors are not considered as self employed. They will have to tick Director on the form. People like sole traders are self employed and need self assessment details from HMRC.
I couldn't find any document or guide where it says limited company directors have to provide HMRC tax record. Also, please can anyone confirm since when limited company directors will have to provide proof of NI contributions? What if a person no longer a limited company director but was at the time of Tier 1 extension only and got ILR on the basis of permanent employment?
Does this effect applications made before April 5?
Thanks.
See the link below for caseworkers instructions
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... utions.pdf
fn286 wrote:gaganjyot wrote:Do I have to provide self employed details as well or only when I was employed
this link doesnt work please share the correct link. Thanks.
Bc4indian wrote:fn286 wrote:gaganjyot wrote:Do I have to provide self employed details as well or only when I was employed
this link doesnt work please share the correct link. Thanks.
Please see the full list here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... s-volume-2
No Idea after the adding new 10 years history page in new form they might do that checks as well and this will add extra time to the processing I believe.what if someone is no longer a director but was during last 5-10 years?
Hope this should be the case.Universal soldier wrote:It doesn't matter that which version of form whether with new section of employment history or not. Because your nino even date of birth is enough to check or extract the past data if they need. I don't think they check everyone rather only check if some suspicious arise. For example self employed people who show more earning with outstanding taxes or bad quality trading activities.
I was asked to provide additional information as I had to replace my passport, the case worker made it clear that they need p60 or payslip to demonstrate to the home Secretary that I meet the residence requirement.Universal soldier wrote:I don't know that whether is it suitable to attach employment history but again repeating what I guess that they don't care where you work. They try to locate your weak immigration history in past and then ask as how you support yourself during that period and if you have no right of work then under good character they will refuse. Maybe they preferring that applicant itself admit his guilt without they even refer HMRC. That's what I guess.
Anais2015 wrote:I was asked to provide additional information as I had to replace my passport, the case worker made it clear that they need p60 or payslip to demonstrate to the home Secretary that I meet the residence requirement.Universal soldier wrote:I don't know that whether is it suitable to attach employment history but again repeating what I guess that they don't care where you work. They try to locate your weak immigration history in past and then ask as how you support yourself during that period and if you have no right of work then under good character they will refuse. Maybe they preferring that applicant itself admit his guilt without they even refer HMRC. That's what I guess.
Anais2015 wrote:I was asked to provide additional information as I had to replace my passport, the case worker made it clear that they need p60 or payslip to demonstrate to the home Secretary that I meet the residence requirement.Universal soldier wrote:I don't know that whether is it suitable to attach employment history but again repeating what I guess that they don't care where you work. They try to locate your weak immigration history in past and then ask as how you support yourself during that period and if you have no right of work then under good character they will refuse. Maybe they preferring that applicant itself admit his guilt without they even refer HMRC. That's what I guess.
That's true. As I had to renew it.Universal soldier wrote:Anais2015 wrote:I was asked to provide additional information as I had to replace my passport, the case worker made it clear that they need p60 or payslip to demonstrate to the home Secretary that I meet the residence requirement.Universal soldier wrote:I don't know that whether is it suitable to attach employment history but again repeating what I guess that they don't care where you work. They try to locate your weak immigration history in past and then ask as how you support yourself during that period and if you have no right of work then under good character they will refuse. Maybe they preferring that applicant itself admit his guilt without they even refer HMRC. That's what I guess.Anais2015 wrote:I was asked to provide additional information as I had to replace my passport, the case worker made it clear that they need p60 or payslip to demonstrate to the home Secretary that I meet the residence requirement.Universal soldier wrote:I don't know that whether is it suitable to attach employment history but again repeating what I guess that they don't care where you work. They try to locate your weak immigration history in past and then ask as how you support yourself during that period and if you have no right of work then under good character they will refuse. Maybe they preferring that applicant itself admit his guilt without they even refer HMRC. That's what I guess.
They probably not have information of your replacement passport and that's why. Why you get replacements passport, is because it was lost??
Wonder how long that took. I requested the same in June. Mid July I gave up waiting and requested a SAR instead. Funny story, both arrived in a matter of days from each other.March_LR14 wrote:I got my past 6 years employment history letter from HMRC today. I still don't remember the dates of my employment which i did in 2006. If i put the guess dates and HO checks with hmrc and finds them incorrect will that be considered as deception on my part?
You don't need to provide any evidence unless they have asked for it in form and read guide as well. If they send a query after you have applied, any evidence of support you received for instance money deposited into your account etc... could be furnished.ElWilly wrote:Hi and thanks for your reply, before I was working I was a student (from 2003 to 2010) and I was supported by my family funding (so I was under a student visa) what do I need to provide to them in this case?Regards.