ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

A section for posts relating to applications for Naturalisation or Registration as a British Citizen. Naturalisation

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha

Locked
legrass
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:29 pm

MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by legrass » Tue Nov 10, 2015 5:44 pm

Hi,

I'm applying for my son under section 1(3). I have now settled in UK (I'm from EU, lived in Uk more than 6 years), he was born in UK and he's now 2 and a half years old.
Reading the forum, I understand that there are no residential requirements (?) but I want to understand whether I should still fill Section 2 of the form or leave it completely untouched.
If yes, I guess only 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 are meaningful. In this case, what should I fill in 2.1 with? (my son has lived in Uk since birth).

Just to be safe, I'm skipping Section 3 because not required under 1(3) applications. Is it right?

Finally a clarification on the referees. A friend of mine is Lecturer at a UK university. He has been spending a lot a time with us since my son was born, but I'm not sure whether he "has engaged with the child in a
professional capacity". In a way, he is helping my son to get exposure to the English language. Would that be a good reason to write in 5.2?

Thanks in advance for your help

noajthan
Moderator
Posts: 14911
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:31 pm
Location: UK

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by noajthan » Tue Nov 10, 2015 6:06 pm

legrass wrote:Hi,

I'm applying for my son under section 1(3). I have now settled in UK (I'm from EU, lived in Uk more than 6 years), he was born in UK and he's now 2 and a half years old.
Reading the forum, I understand that there are no residential requirements (?) but I want to understand whether I should still fill Section 2 of the form or leave it completely untouched.
If yes, I guess only 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4 are meaningful. In this case, what should I fill in 2.1 with? (my son has lived in Uk since birth).

Just to be safe, I'm skipping Section 3 because not required under 1(3) applications. Is it right?

Finally a clarification on the referees. A friend of mine is Lecturer at a UK university. He has been spending a lot a time with us since my son was born, but I'm not sure whether he "has engaged with the child in a professional capacity". In a way, he is helping my son to get exposure to the English language. Would that be a good reason to write in 5.2?

Thanks in advance for your help
No formal residential requirements especially for a young minor.

From MN1 guidance, notes 2.1 can be left blank:
Re 2.1
For an application in respect of a child who was born abroad and who is now living in the UK or a British overseas territory, please say when they first arrived
Ref: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... ations.pdf

Fill in rest of section 2 as appropriate.

Yes, skip section 3; it's not applicable your case.

For 5.2 Stating something like "Family friend" should explain the relationship adequately.
All that is gold does not glitter; Not all those who wander are lost. E&OE.

legrass
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by legrass » Tue Nov 10, 2015 7:20 pm

Thanks for your answer.
If residential status is not required, do I need also to specify 2.3, all the absences? I have travelled a lot (although for few days at a time) and finding back all of them over almost 3 years is going to be tricky..how precise should it be?

noajthan
Moderator
Posts: 14911
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:31 pm
Location: UK

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by noajthan » Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:45 pm

legrass wrote:Thanks for your answer.
If residential status is not required, do I need also to specify 2.3, all the absences? I have travelled a lot (although for few days at a time) and finding back all of them over almost 3 years is going to be tricky..how precise should it be?
Q2.3 is about your child's absences.

As the form says:
Failure to complete this will result in delay to the application
Suggest aim to be as accurate as possible. In filling such applications, always aim to give HO as little 'wriggle room' as possible.
(Remember you also have to sign the declaration confirming the quality of information being submitted).

Good luck.
All that is gold does not glitter; Not all those who wander are lost. E&OE.

legrass
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by legrass » Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:32 pm

noajthan wrote:
legrass wrote:Thanks for your answer.
If residential status is not required, do I need also to specify 2.3, all the absences? I have travelled a lot (although for few days at a time) and finding back all of them over almost 3 years is going to be tricky..how precise should it be?
Q2.3 is about your child's absences.

As the form says:
Failure to complete this will result in delay to the application
Suggest aim to be as accurate as possible. In filling such applications, always aim to give HO as little 'wriggle room' as possible.
(Remember you also have to sign the declaration confirming the quality of information being submitted).

Good luck.
Thanks again. Last question :)
what's the purpose of specifying the child's absences if residential status is not a requirement and the HO have no discretion in the decision? Is there a maximum number of absence days? Which is the relative normative?
From the FAQ:
Q1: Can my son apply for naturalisation?
[...]
UK born
In the child was born in the UK before one parent had ILR/PR, then once one parent is granted ILR, the child is entitled register as BC under section 1(3) of the British Nationality Act irrespective of their immigration status.
This application is an entitlement and as such the HO has no discretion in the decision if the statutory requirements are met. [...]
Q2: My child has been away from the UK. Can he apply for Registration?

There are no residential requirements for application under section 1(3) (child born in the UK before parent was granted ILR/PR).

Thanks again

noajthan
Moderator
Posts: 14911
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:31 pm
Location: UK

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by noajthan » Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:43 pm

legrass wrote:Thanks again. Last question :)
what's the purpose of specifying the child's absences if residential status is not a requirement and the HO have no discretion in the decision? Is there a maximum number of absence days? Which is the relative normative?
statutory requirements are met. [...]
It's a generic form, it applies to many types of applicants under different sections of BNA - you just fill it in as per your (child's) circumstances.

HO caseworker will decide what information they use & what they discount from your answers.
But leaving out information will just delay things unless the guidance specifically indicates you can skip a section or its optional for your case.

Which is the relative normative? - I don't know what you mean
All that is gold does not glitter; Not all those who wander are lost. E&OE.

legrass
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:29 pm

Re: MN1 - 1(3) Section 2 to fill?

Post by legrass » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:04 pm

noajthan wrote:
legrass wrote:Thanks again. Last question :)
what's the purpose of specifying the child's absences if residential status is not a requirement and the HO have no discretion in the decision? Is there a maximum number of absence days? Which is the relative normative?
statutory requirements are met. [...]
It's a generic form, it applies to many types of applicants under different sections of BNA - you just fill it in as per your (child's) circumstances.

HO caseworker will decide what information they use & what they discount from your answers.
But leaving out information will just delay things unless the guidance specifically indicates you can skip a section or its optional for your case.
ok it makes sense then. It is just superfluous but still important to fill to avoid any trouble.

thank you

Locked