- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
I think child may apply for entry clearance as a PBS dependant, in line with wife's.sushdmehta wrote:Apply for child's entry clearance as "child of settled person".
Get your wife and child back in UK before your wife's PBS dependant leave expires.
Doesn't PBS dependant fall under "other parent is being or has been given limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom with a view to settlement"? I thought so ....?301(i) wrote:(a) one parent is present and settled in the United Kingdom or being admitted on the same occasion for settlement and the other parent is being or has been given limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom with a view to settlement;
sushdmehta wrote:But PBS leave will be granted for only a couple of months (wife's current leave expires March 2016) and will need to be extended along with wife's, whereas as child of settled person the leave will be for 27 months to take the child right through to the time PBS dependant parent becomes eligible for settlement (Dec 2017). One application rather than two, save money?
At the time of settlement, either route will cost the same (assuming SET(F) does not cost more than SET(O) in 2017).
Under current rates:
SET(F) + SET(O) = £3000
SET(O) including 1 dependant = £3000
Any disadvantage, vinny?
Imagine a born-abroad child where one parent is settled (let's say under LR route) and the other parent is a principal PBS migrant? Does that mean that the child can apply for entry clearance only as a dependant of the PBS migrant parent but not as a child of the settled parent?vinny wrote:I'm not sure. That may refer to spouse with settlement visa?
and281 wrote:The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom with a view to settlement as the spouse or civil partner of a person present and settled in the United Kingdom or who is on the same occasion being admitted for settlement are that:
So, they may expect the other parent to have qualified under those categories? Hence, a reason for 302, the period of leave granted not exceeding 27 months, in line with 282 or 295B?295A wrote:The requirements to be met by a person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom with a view to settlement as the unmarried or same-sex partner of a person present and settled in the United Kingdom or being admitted on the same occasion for settlement, are that:
Could this have referred to leave granted under 282 or 295B only?A280 wrote:(f) Paragraphs 301-303F continue to apply to applications made under this route on or after 9 July 2012, and are not subject to any additional requirement listed in (b) above, by a child of a person to whom those paragraphs relate who has been granted limited leave to enter or remain or an extension of stay following an application made before 9 July 2012,
Note use of "category leading to settlement".SET7.1 What are the settlement provisions for children under the Rules? wrote:A child who wishes to join or accompany a parent when the parent has limited leave to enter or remain in a category leading to settlement. (SET7.13)
If "with a view to settlement" is associated only with people in UK or applying to enter UK under Appendix FM, then:SET7.13 How do Children of parents(s) being admitted with a view to settlement in the UK qualify? wrote:A child may qualify for leave to enter with a view to settlement through qualifying to accompany or join a parent or parents (but not a relative) who has / have been granted limited leave to enter or remain with a view to settlement.
Won't this be a case of discrimination?Imagine a born-abroad child where one parent is settled (let's say under LR route) and the other parent is a principal PBS migrant? Does that mean that the child can apply for entry clearance only as a dependant of the PBS migrant parent but not as a child of the settled parent?