- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Sounds like a great FOI (whatdotheyknow) request.Sofiathefirst wrote:Hello Everyone,
Does anyone know if it's more common to take an oath or make an affirmation during the citizenship ceremony.
I know it's an individual choice and we can choose whichever we prefer but was just wondering if anyone knew which is the more common method preferred.
Thanks
Sofiathefirst
I don't really think anyone would be able say one was better compared to the other. As Casa has mentioned its really personal preference. As far as how many would swear on the bible vs affirm, on the day I attended my ceremony earlier this year, it was a 50:50 split, with red vs. blue cards given (with the words to recite) and associated seating on two different sides of the middle aisle.Sofiathefirst wrote:Thanks,
Yes, that would be interesting to know.
Any suggestions which would be better in the case a person has no preference. I have my ceremony soon and would just like to go with whichever way the greater majority of people take it, however have no idea which that is..
Suggest simply doing what feels right for you on your special day.Sofiathefirst wrote:Thanks,
Yes, that would be interesting to know.
Any suggestions which would be better in the case a person has no preference. I have my ceremony soon and would just like to go with whichever way the greater majority of people take it, however have no idea which that is..
On the day of my husband's ceremony, it was actually a much higher percentage of attendees electing to affirm and there was no separation in seating.cs95tdg wrote:I don't really think anyone would be able say one was better compared to the other. As Casa has mentioned its really personal preference. As far as how many would swear on the bible vs affirm, on the day I attended my ceremony earlier this year, it was a 50:50 split, with red vs. blue cards given (with the words to recite) and associated seating on two different sides of the middle aisle.Sofiathefirst wrote:Thanks,
Yes, that would be interesting to know.
Any suggestions which would be better in the case a person has no preference. I have my ceremony soon and would just like to go with whichever way the greater majority of people take it, however have no idea which that is..
I remember thinking that my local council must have assigned ceremony dates based on individual preferences mentioned at the time of booking the ceremony date, otherwise it would be too much of a coincidence to have an exact 50:50 split in numbers.Casa wrote:On the day of my husband's ceremony, it was actually a much higher percentage of attendees electing to affirm and there was no separation in seating.cs95tdg wrote:I don't really think anyone would be able say one was better compared to the other. As Casa has mentioned its really personal preference. As far as how many would swear on the bible vs affirm, on the day I attended my ceremony earlier this year, it was a 50:50 split, with red vs. blue cards given (with the words to recite) and associated seating on two different sides of the middle aisle.Sofiathefirst wrote:Thanks,
Yes, that would be interesting to know.
Any suggestions which would be better in the case a person has no preference. I have my ceremony soon and would just like to go with whichever way the greater majority of people take it, however have no idea which that is..
Thanks for the suggestion.noajthan wrote: Didn't notice anyone wearing a colander on their head but you never know.
That was not a suggestion, that was a reference to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Also see this Daily Mail article.wpilr_nov12 wrote:Thanks for the suggestion.noajthan wrote: Didn't notice anyone wearing a colander on their head but you never know.