- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Completely agree with you. I've always felt that EU citizens have had more rights when it came to bringing in their spouses than British citizens. How is that fair in any way? Having an income requirement, of which is higher than the minimum national wage, on one partner to get the other one in the country is just harsh.HRH wrote:
- Being in EU, UK has already allowed non tax payers from across the EU to settle in UK with their dependents irrespective of their nationality & to claim benefits at the cost of tax payers. However UK citizens & tax payers who pay taxes throughout with no expectation of benefits are the ones who suffer the most as there is virtually no visa policy for dependents of UK citizens. Isn't it penalizing your own citizens for paying the taxes?
- There are many smart, wealthy, law abiding & god fearing people outside EU who wish to invest their time, money, energy in UK. They definitely don't expect to receive benefits, except for the expectation of a decent/ safe life which perhaps their native countries can't offer. Shouldn't the authorities be making a case by case decision instead of rejecting the applicant just because he/she is not from EU?
What worries me after listening to Theresa May's speech is that there is no sign of her doing her homework either. She is saying we will get the best possible trade deal with no freedom of movement (in a nutshell), but what if the EU says no way and the best possible deal UK will get is no deal at all? She has to get prepared for that or it is going to be another shock for the country. And she has to say that to the people rather than hoping her plan "A" will fly and pretending the possibility of getting no trade deal does not exist.ILR1980 wrote:Brexit teams have not done their home work and they all seem clueless and confuse when it come to economy and immigration model
From what I understand from the reactions of leaders & interview of French minister Madame Royal,,,Nimitta wrote:What worries me after listening to Theresa May's speech is that there is no sign of her doing her homework either. She is saying we will get the best possible trade deal with no freedom of movement (in a nutshell), but what if the EU says no way and the best possible deal UK will get is no deal at all? She has to get prepared for that or it is going to be another shock for the country. And she has to say that to the people rather than hoping her plan "A" will fly and pretending the possibility of getting no trade deal does not exist.ILR1980 wrote:Brexit teams have not done their home work and they all seem clueless and confuse when it come to economy and immigration model
There are times when politics simply outstrips the law. This feels like one of them.
Many in the first group think a liberal immigration policy, like membership of the the European Union, makes for the sort of society they celebrate - they are not simply "tolerant" but enthusiastic about diversity, be it in terms of sexuality or a multicultural society.
The second group feels immigration causes them economic pain and in some case culture shock: it is an affront to their sense of a homogeneous country.
...
Leavers tend to believe in a strong unitary state, based at Westminster, ruling over the whole of the UK. They dislike devolution and the EU in equal measure, and believe not so much in the old British Empire, but in what some have called the English Empire.
Not unlike this thread.I know two families talking seriously of moving to Scotland so they can stay in the EU.
Would Brexit cause the revival of the Commonwealth as a trading bloc? It has the advantage that due to the common British heritage, the core legal concepts are the same (unlike the UK-EU legal distinctions) and that it concludes the booming economy of India. It may be the return of the prodigal parent rather than the prodigal son to the family.Foreign Minister Murray McCully has offered Britain any help New Zealand can give to assist its post-Brexit negotiations - and isn't ruling out giving them the use of our top trade negotiators.
He also floated the possibility of Britain choosing to rapidly sign a "symbolic" free trade agreement with New Zealand.
To be honest it seem that all those who were leading the leave campaign did not expected the victory for leave side and now they have no clue how to handle the situation as they are giving contradictory statements. Its easy to give emotional speeches about economy and about taking back control but its hard to put these plans in practice. David Cameron is better speaker than this Nigel, Boris or Theresa May so future is uncertainNimitta wrote:What worries me after listening to Theresa May's speech is that there is no sign of her doing her homework either. She is saying we will get the best possible trade deal with no freedom of movement (in a nutshell), but what if the EU says no way and the best possible deal UK will get is no deal at all? She has to get prepared for that or it is going to be another shock for the country. And she has to say that to the people rather than hoping her plan "A" will fly and pretending the possibility of getting no trade deal does not exist.ILR1980 wrote:Brexit teams have not done their home work and they all seem clueless and confuse when it come to economy and immigration model
Some MPs are trying to form an informal coalition and force the government to regocnise the rights of EU citizens currently residing in the UK in British law. I heard that from people working at one of the main parties' HQ. It's early stages though and it seems like EU migrants will become a bargaining chip when it comes to the actual process of withdrawal.secret.simon wrote:I apologise as this is unrelated to the theme of this discussion, but is relevant to it.
In breaking news, I heard on the radio (the six o'clock news on Radio 4) that the IPPR (The Institute for Public Policy Research) has suggested that all EU citizens in the UK be given ILR, possibly via emergency legislation, to prevent hordes of skilled EU citizens exitting the UK en masse.
I am unable to find a link to the story and will post links as and when I get it, but this is interesting as all EU citizens, not just those with PR, are included in their proposals.
Mind you, the IPPR is just a think-tank and a left leaning one at that. But the idea is out there for it to be progressed.
It seems so. Although it is a double edged sward. Over a million brits forced to go back home from the EU... Any party or government that will make this kind of decision is doomed. And unlike the 3 millions of EU citizens livin in the UK those over 1 million are voters you know. They have families in the UK, and they all will be furious.dapto10 wrote:Some MPs are trying to form an informal coalition and force the government to regocnise the rights of EU citizens currently residing in the UK in British law. I heard that from people working at one of the main parties' HQ. It's early stages though and it seems like EU migrants will become a bargaining chip when it comes to the actual process of withdrawal.
dapto10 wrote:Some MPs are trying to form an informal coalition and force the government to recognise the rights of EU citizens currently residing in the UK in British law. I heard that from people working at one of the main parties' HQ. It's early stages though and it seems like EU migrants will become a bargaining chip when it comes to the actual process of withdrawal.secret.simon wrote:I apologise as this is unrelated to the theme of this discussion, but is relevant to it.
In breaking news, I heard on the radio (the six o'clock news on Radio 4) that the IPPR (The Institute for Public Policy Research) has suggested that all EU citizens in the UK be given ILR, possibly via emergency legislation, to prevent hordes of skilled EU citizens exitting the UK en masse.
I am unable to find a link to the story and will post links as and when I get it, but this is interesting as all EU citizens, not just those with PR, are included in their proposals.
Mind you, the IPPR is just a think-tank and a left leaning one at that. But the idea is out there for it to be progressed.
You're absolutely right! What worries me is the fact that (so called) senior politicians are now speculating and 'playing' with the idea, including a UKIP member of the Lords who suggested exactly that... and there are some MPs talking about repealing ECA 1972 which could bring even more uncertainty.Nimitta wrote: It seems so. Although it is a double edged sward. Over a million brits forced to go back home from the EU... Any party or government that will make this kind of decision is doomed. And unlike the 3 millions of EU citizens livin in the UK those over 1 million are voters you know. They have families in the UK, and they all will be furious.
If you followed the EEA route forum you'd know that there are many instances of resident EEA nationals ceasing to be a qualified person or permanent resident. When that happens to those not married to another EEA national, they usually cease to be legal residents. The usual consequence is that someone fails to achieve permanent residence when they expected to.dapto10 wrote:The official Vote Leave statement was something in the lines of "Everyone who's 'legally' in Britain will be allowed to stay'. My question is what does 'legally' actually mean. All EU citizens are here legally right now, it's called Freedom of Movement. So the whole "Everyone legally here would be allowed to stay' thing is nonsense and a rather arrogant speculation.
I heard them say, every EU citizen working in the UK. That's certainly not every person in the UK under EU rules.dapto10 wrote:
The official Vote Leave statement was something in the lines of "Everyone who's 'legally' in Britain will be allowed to stay'.
Brilliant. Spot on!secret.simon wrote:There's many a slip 'twixt cup and lip.
If you think about it,
Nobody expected a leave vote,
Then nobody expected David Cameron not to trigger Article 50 immediatly,
Then nobody expected Theresa May to be the lead contender to be Prime Minister
Then nobody expected Boris Johnson to step aside from the leadership elections (there goes that amnesty for illegal migrants);
Then nobody expected the bloodletting in the Labour Party
Then nobody expected the Spanish Inquisition.
Moral of the story: It is unpredictable times. Almost every crystal ball in the UK has cracked under the strain. Accept what is at the moment and do not speculate on what may be, for it almost certainly will not come to pass.
Que sera sera (What will be, will be)