atriponel wrote:living in limbo is just hell.
Well,
Limbo is a neutral zone for good pagans and infants, on the boundaries of Hell (perhaps like the Calais jungle; the promised land is in sight but so far away) in Christian theology. So the feeling is understandable. But I digress.
alterhase58 wrote:Recommend everyone gets their documentation in order,
This, I think, is the best option at the moment. In UK immigration law, the date of application and/or the date of issue of a Home office document can have impact much further down the line, including at later applications much further in the future (for example, requirements for spouses of UK citizens who applied before 9th July 2012 and after are markedly different, even in 2017).
Therefore, although EU law invests you with a status without paperwork, it is in your best interests to get appropriate Home office documentation as soon as possible, whether it be a Registration Certificate or Card or a PR certificate or card.
atriponel wrote:Will there be any changes for us (EU nationals AND their non-EU family members) now that Article 50 has been triggered? Or will it remain the same for a two-year period?
For at least two years, EU law will continue to apply. What happens on this day in two years is anybody's guess. A lot of crystal balls shattered on 24rd June 2016 and I doubt anybody (not even the Prime Minister) can give you a prediction, much less a cast-iron guarantee.
atriponel wrote:I am also quite curious to see how Theresa May will manage to secure the rights of EU nationals (and their family I assume?) living here in the UK. And how long will it take? It sounds like years of work
Not really. This is not the first time that the status of foreigners living in the UK has changed. We have had a lot of experience through the past fifty years. The current Immigration Act 1971, which still governs the stay of non-EEA citizens, was a response to an inflow of a high number of Commonwealth citizens, which was a pre-EU quasi-"free movement of people" zone.
What is different is that there is another party to negotiate with. Such change will not be unilateral, but a part of a negotiated agreement.
Apologies for harrying the mods again, but should this thread be merged with
this one? They are quite similar in context.
I am not a lawyer or immigration advisor. My statements/comments do not constitute legal advice. E&OE. Please do not PM me for advice.