I met my American boyfriend 5 years ago - I am a British resident in France. We stayed in contact over email and phone for 4 years as friends, and September 2007 I came to visit him in California for 2 weeks. I came to visit him again in November 2007 for 2 weeks. In January 2008 I came here for 90 days on visa waiver program. In April the 90 days were up, so we both went back to Europe for 2 weeks. On April 16th 2008 we came back and I was allowed entry for another 90 days. At this point the immigration officer said that I was "abusing the system" by staying for so long, and that I should spend as much time out of the USA as in.
My interpretation is that when I leave again on July 15th, I should have to stay in Europe for six months before I try to return on visa waiver. This is clearly not the most desirable situation.
So I am looking into options to return without us having to get married after only 6 months of living together. These options are:
1 - Apply for a tourist visa on return to France.
Problems with this are a) proving significant ties. I have no job there, but I do have my family, i.e. parents home, where I have lived on and off for 16 years.
b) proving that I have enough money to pay for the trip. My boyfriend supports me while I am out here, consequently, I have little resources, as cannot work on visa waiver.
2 - Hazard my chances with immigration by returning to USA after only 6 weeks on visa waiver.
Problems with this are: a) again, short duration of 90 days
b) risk of entry being refused and this complicating future visa applications
3 - Apply for K-3 visa on basis of Common Law Marriage, or Pacte Civil de Solidarité in France
Problems with this are: a) ambiguity of immigration law
b) boyfriend would have to make another trip to France to sign the pact, and would be hard for him to leave work, plus extra expense.
Which option should I follow and why?
Thanks very much for your help.
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222