- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Yes, I thought so, so I asked the Administrator here to set it up.yankeegirl wrote:Off topic, but brilliant idea to have a separate benefits section!
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ntcmanua ... 350050.htmPeople who are subject to a maintenance undertaking
A claimant whose leave to enter, or remain in, the United Kingdom (UK) is subject to a maintenance undertaking (sometimes known as 'sponsored immigrant') is normally excluded from WTC and CTC as a person subject to immigration control, but they can qualify for tax credits if
They have been resident in the UK for a period of at least 5 years beginning on or after their date of entry into the UK
Or
The date they became a sponsored immigrant, whichever is later
They have not been resident for at least 5 years but their sponsor has died
Or
The Tax Credits (Immigration) Regulations 2003 andjes2jes wrote:Can you provide a link to Reg 3(2) that you often quote and Rule 6B of the immigration Rule/Act since I do not seem to find it?
Introduction wrote:6B. A person shall not be regarded as having recourse to public funds if he is a person who is not excluded from specified benefits under section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 by virtue of regulations made under sub-sections (3) and (4) of that section or section 42 of the Tax Credits Act 2002.
John:John wrote:jes2jes, you post a section starting "People who are subject to a maintenance undertaking". But why is that relevant here? Has a maintenance undertaking been signed?
Vinny, thanks for posting those links. I confirm that a read of the Tax Credits (Immigration) Regulations 2003 will show that they were made under the terms of Section 42 of the Tax Credits Act 2002, which is specifically quoted in rule 6B of the Immigration Rules.
Thanks Vinny and John, you have made my day!vinny wrote:The Tax Credits (Immigration) Regulations 2003 andjes2jes wrote:Can you provide a link to Reg 3(2) that you often quote and Rule 6B of the immigration Rule/Act since I do not seem to find it?Introduction wrote:6B. A person shall not be regarded as having recourse to public funds if he is a person who is not excluded from specified benefits under section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 by virtue of regulations made under sub-sections (3) and (4) of that section or section 42 of the Tax Credits Act 2002.
I suspect that a maintenance agreement has not been signed, so the quote you provided is not in play.I guess I did not get the maintenance undertaking drift that is the reason why I was asking.
That is always a danger!Just to let you know some of the links in your old post on this subject are no longer working and would need updating
John,John wrote:I suspect that a maintenance agreement has not been signed, so the quote you provided is not in play.I guess I did not get the maintenance undertaking drift that is the reason why I was asking.
That is always a danger!Just to let you know some of the links in your old post on this subject are no longer working and would need updatingBut could you be more specific? I cannot immediately see the topic to which you might be referring.
There is a question on Child benefit form which asks whether you've been granted your status within the past 3 months (something about not being subject to immigration control). Just wondered why do they ask it? What effect does it have on a claim if you can claim benefit even the next day after being granted ILR.John wrote:.and such claims should be submitted without delay, to ensure that benefit is not lost
I agree to the above but can you answer this question for me please:John wrote:I think they would ask that because a CB claim can possibly be backdated a maximum of three months. However, let's say someone got their ILR one month ago, well the backdating would possibly not go earlier than when they got their ILR, hence the need for the question.
John, I know you had answered this question several times, I got ILR just this month, when I start receiving CTC and CB, would it be okay to tick those on the FLR(M) for my spouse to say that I am receiving these? My salary is okay and she's also working but want to be on the safe side
John,John wrote:Not sure I understand. Your wife's FLR(M) form has already been submitted? Were you claiming CB and TCs at the time? If no, then clearly that is how the form would have been completed.
But if the form FLR(M) has not yet been submitted .... what's the delay? .... there really is no issue here about you claiming CB, and you and your spouse jointly claiming TCs. There is a perfect entitlement to make those claims. So it is certainly OK to tick those boxes.
No problems for you to claim child benefit and for both you and your husband to jointly claim tax credits.Bubblies wrote:I am a british citizen, my problem is my husband is here on an ancestral visa and my kids are on an ancestral dependency visa.