- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Jackson thank you so much for taking the time to reply it is very much appreciated.Jackson2004 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 6:43 pmWhilst the UK is going through the transition period you technically enjoy the same rights as you did when you were an EU citizen, this means that it *should* still technically be possible obtain an EU treaty right visa as applications are supposed to be processed within 6 weeks.
Home office guidance suggests that the UK is going to allow repatriation for up-to 2 years after the end of the transition period. If this policy is implemented as expected then you will be able to return to the UK with your spouse. This is assuming that the UK home office do not see your time in the host country as anything less than genuine residency, which might involve looking into your history in the EU host country. Though recently this part of the decision making process was deemed unlawful, EU legislation will no longer provide the necessary protections to ensure that your rights are respected. If you were granted an EU visa it would be recommended to remain in the country for as long as possible whilst still allowing you a little time to go through the application process in the UK (at least 1 year, preferably 1.5), before applying for permission to return.
Whilst it is still technically possible it will be challenging. Whilst EUTR applications are supposed to be expedited, and not take more than 6 weeks, in reality many applications do take a lot longer, and most countries have closed there immigration offices due to COVID. Even if you did get a decision soon enough unless you have a clear-cut case the decision maker could easily reject an application on spurious grounds, and you are unlikely to have time to reapply. It would be important to get all your documents in order so you have a very strong initial case.
I would recommend at least
- Proof of employment in the host country (employment letter and payslips), or sufficient means to sustain yourselves (health insurance, bank statements etc.)
- Proof of accommodation in the destination country (utilities + tenancy)
- Apostled marriage certificate and proof of identity (passports)
Ignore EU treaty right guidance that suggests anything less than the documents above. Without the above there is a good possibility the decision maker will reject your case (this happened to me).
You would have the best chance of succeeding by avoiding Republic of Ireland (who are known to reject the majority of initial EUTR visa applications coming from UK citizens), and choosing a country where you have the highest chance of success. Try to find a country that has not closed its immigration offices / borders due to Covid.
The fact that you have previously enjoyed a successful UK visa application should work in your favor, certainly a failed application would probably hinder your chances.
I'm not sure I can recommend this approach, because I have a feeling it could one day be used against you, but you may or may not have better success in getting a residency permit soon enough if you can somehow get her into the host country without an EUTR visa. As long as she is in an EU country with you she enjoys the same right of residence regardless as to how she got there, but an EUTR application could take a lot longer to process than a visitor visa. As long as the visa is from Europe, the Visa does not have to come from the same country where you intend to end up and some countries are quicker at processing applications than others.
Whilst you don't have much it could still be possible, especially if the UK decide to extend the transition period due to COVID. If you do attempt this route I wish you all the best and please let me know how it works out.
What makes you say that? As a UK citizen I still have the right to travel to the EU and exercise my freedom of movement up until the end of December this year if I’m not very much mistaken.
I am not a lawyer, any my interpretation of the law may therefore not be accurate or correct, but I think I can hazard a guess at what @Obie means.
Pretty much. At least that is what the government says anyway in their policy document that was in place until March 2020.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 7:27 amI am not a lawyer, any my interpretation of the law may therefore not be accurate or correct, but I think I can hazard a guess at what @Obie means.
The Surinder Singh route is based on an EEA citizen exercising rights under the EU Treaties in another EEA member-state and then returning to his home EEA member-state.
The UK exited the EU Treaties on 31st January 2020. Therefore, in that legal sense, British citizens are no longer EEA citizens and they can't exercise rights under the EU Treaties.
The Withdrawal Agreement between the UK and the EU gives British and EU citizens some rights to move to each other till the end of the year. But I'm not sure it can be counted as "freedom of movement" under the EU Treaties.
Therefore, it is possible to argue that the Surinder Singh route would not apply to family members of a British citizen who had not exercised their Treaty Rights in some form in another EEA member-state before 31st January 2020.
In simple terms, I suspect that for the Surinder Singh route to work, the British citizen and family member should have started exercising treaty rights together in another EEA member-state before 31st January 2020 and then return to the UK before the specified period (which ranges from the end of 2020 to 2022, based on the type of relationship between the British citizen and the family member).
The Withdrawal Agreement provides that UK citizens can still move to EEA countries and EEA citizens can still move to the UK with their family members till the end of the year.
The UK will likely (but not certainly) be added to the list of countries whose nationals can apply for ETIAS, the EU equivalent to the US ESTA and the Canadian ETA. Canada, Australia and Hong Kong are already on that list.mattp73 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:12 pmNot sure how travel to the EU will be like after brexit is done...a visa of some sort I assume but I would imagine same for an EU citizen travelling to the UK for a visit...does anyone know yet...I imagine maybe a landing card similar to when you fly to the US. 30 or 60 day stamp in your passport???
I have no idea of how much you have dealt with the Home Office, but the Home Office takes a very severe view of mixed nationality families. It generally takes the view that while UK citizens have a right to reside in the UK, their family members don't have an automatic right. And that UK citizens are free to leave the UK if they want to live with a family member that can't get a visa.Jackson2004 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 10:53 amOtherwise couples could potentially be uprooted and left without a home they can share through no fault of there own.
https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/eu-rights-clin ... g-the-law/If the UK was to leave the EU would this close the Surinder Singh route?
Not necessarily. This would depend on the terms of the UK’s exit that would need to be negotiated under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union as inserted by the Lisbon Treaty. If the United Kingdom was to leave the EU but agree to join the European Economic Area (currently the EU states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) in order to continue its participation in the Single Market, the Surinder Singh case would continue to have effect in the UK by virtue of Article 28 of the EEA Agreement. If the United Kingdom was to negotiate a stand-alone Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons like Switzerland has negotiated with the EU, then this case law would continue to have effect for the purposes of interpreting any such stand-alone agreement.
I have used the SS route, just before the lockdown ) to facilitate tipping up at the UK border in FR with my non-EU wife and no UK visa ..just lots of docs / evidence and 10 hours later and being questioned separately, we were in ...Obie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 3:49 pmAs Secret Simon correctly stated, the foundation of Surinder singh originates from the Treaty and the provision on Union Citizen.
A United Kingdom national is no longer a Union Citizen, therefore he cannot argue the treaty should be available to him or her upon her return or else she will be hindered from exercising this right.
Hi Obie, Secretsimon,Obie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:00 pmPretty much. At least that is what the government says anyway in their policy document that was in place until March 2020.secret.simon wrote: ↑Sat Apr 25, 2020 7:27 amI am not a lawyer, any my interpretation of the law may therefore not be accurate or correct, but I think I can hazard a guess at what @Obie means.
The Surinder Singh route is based on an EEA citizen exercising rights under the EU Treaties in another EEA member-state and then returning to his home EEA member-state.
The UK exited the EU Treaties on 31st January 2020. Therefore, in that legal sense, British citizens are no longer EEA citizens and they can't exercise rights under the EU Treaties.
The Withdrawal Agreement between the UK and the EU gives British and EU citizens some rights to move to each other till the end of the year. But I'm not sure it can be counted as "freedom of movement" under the EU Treaties.
Therefore, it is possible to argue that the Surinder Singh route would not apply to family members of a British citizen who had not exercised their Treaty Rights in some form in another EEA member-state before 31st January 2020.
In simple terms, I suspect that for the Surinder Singh route to work, the British citizen and family member should have started exercising treaty rights together in another EEA member-state before 31st January 2020 and then return to the UK before the specified period (which ranges from the end of 2020 to 2022, based on the type of relationship between the British citizen and the family member).
I understand that the No deal aspect has been removed, and not relevant, but as far as Surinder Singh is concerned, it remain good.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... ter-brexit
+1 I am leaving the UK soon. For a few months to start but I may never come back if they want to destroy the country over Covid and Brexit.ryuzaki wrote: ↑Tue Oct 13, 2020 4:04 pmMy advice is leave and don't come back. The UK is going down the drain with brexit and increasingly bad immigration rules. You will probably find you like Spain or wherever you go more anyway.
Consider Ireland too, thanks to the border you may have better rights over there, although re-unification looks inevitable now.
Hope it works for you but I am not a great believer in this route.