- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Your husband is clearly a British Citizen and there is absolutely no problem him claiming Public Funds ....for himself. What he is prohibited from doing is claiming any increase in those Public Funds because of you, but I suspect ... hope ... that he is not claiming any such increases at the moment.Ask your husband to come off the benefits at least for the time necessary to get you a visa.
You say ... we ... there is no need for your husband to travel to the States. And no need, from the visa point of view, for your child to travel back either ... but I take the point about the feeding! How long do you intend to breastfeed for?also we dont have the funds to go back to the states to apply, not at the moment.
Nope. This is what "we wish" but not the fact. Both the sponsor and immigrant must not claim any public money denoted in immigration rules as "public funds". If a sponsor claims benefits and an immigrant lives with them both are left to fend for themselves from the date an immigrant enters the country.John wrote: But I disagree with :-Your husband is clearly a British Citizen and there is absolutely no problem him claiming Public Funds ....for himself.Ask your husband to come off the benefits at least for the time necessary to get you a visa.
What you suspect here is correct.What he is prohibited from doing is claiming any increase in those Public Funds because of you, but I suspect ... hope ... that he is not claiming any such increases at the moment.
Not only that, Jeff, I actually know quite a number of people who have continued to claim Public Funds while their spouse was applying for a visa .... such claims to Public Funds having no detrimental effect.Home Office policy on public funds is that there is no objection to the British citizen/settled sponsor receiving any public funds to which he is entitled in his own right. The important factor to consider is whether there will be a need for the sponsor to claim additional public funds to support the applicant.
Belive or not, John but I'd rather she didn't. Speaking in reality, she should have never been entitled to them anyway. She was a healthy and strong young woman who could work and earn like everyone else. This how some people like these (just because they have a title "British Citizen") waste the money you pay from your scarce earnings.John wrote: Suspect your ex-wife has good grounds for claiming damages for those benefits she was advised to give up!