- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
As far as I understand, you cannot do a second qualification if it is not a progression from your first and you are applying from inside the UK, I'm afraid. This is precisely to prevent eternal students who do masters after masters for the sake of staying in the UK.
The academic progression requirement is in place to ensure that students are progressing academically if they wish to study a further course in the UK, and are not just seeking to extend their stay in the UK.
You certainly can. I don't advise citing the caseworker guidance on its own without first looking at the immigration rules that the guidance supports.
I don't advise citing someone else's post without reading it in full. I did say "if it is not a progression from your first", which describes the conditions you cite. This does not seem to be the OP's case.sah10406 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 08, 2022 12:58 pmYou certainly can. I don't advise citing the caseworker guidance on its own without first looking at the immigration rules that the guidance supports.
Appendix Student, paragraph 14.3(c)(iv) specifically allows OP to apply in the UK to study another course at the same level as long as either (a) or (b) applies and is confirmed on the CAS:
(a) the new course of study is related to the applicant’s previous course of study (meaning that it is either connected to the previous course, part of the same subject group, or involves deeper specialisation); or
(b) the combination of the previous course of study and the new course of study support the applicant’s genuine career aspirations.
[...]
See https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration ... ix-student
My concern is just that the definition of "academic progress" is not that intuitive to the general reader. So a definitive "no" to OP doing further study that isn't "progression" could mislead them, because they would not know or assume that "progression" can sometimes illogically include study at the same level.
My post is not a definite no. That's only your interpretation of it, and it is incorrect. I simply posted what is a fact, and backed it with a reference to the source.
I never said they don't meet the criteria, I said that it does not seem they meet it. Big difference.We don't know anything about the course content or their career aspirations, so they may or may not meet it.