- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Your partner needs to establish exactly what the British Embassy in the Ukraine require to satisfy them as regards the matter of Sole Custody. It is not just a question of the child's father not raising any objection ... some sort of Court Order will probably be needed.Well there is no mention of custody of her son in the divorce but I do not expect the father to create any trouble.
Sorry, you are totally missing the point. If your partner returns to the UK with a fiancée visa in her passport she would have legal status! In any case, at the moment, it is legally impossible for her to marry in the UK, in view of a change of law that came into effect on 01.02.05. But the fiancée visa will change all that.We'd love to but with a long expired visa and no legal status in this country we have visions of the ceremony being interrupted by the police.
You mean she has a passport but it has expired? Isn't the answer obvious? She needs to contact the Ukrainian Embassy in London.Also how is my partner supposed to get to the Ukraine. No valid passport.
If the conditions are met the visa will be granted. There is no quota system. Assuming that you are British or otherwise settled in the UK, you need to pass three main tests ... financial ... prove that your partner and her son will not need to claim certain public funds ... accommodation ... that the accommodation is "suitable" and certainly not overcrowded ... "evidence of contact" ... clearly not a problem after four years together.I have heard of people not being allowed to import their wives into the country
you need to pass three main tests ... financial ... prove that your partner and her son will not need to claim certain public funds ... accommodation ... that the accommodation is "suitable" and certainly not overcrowded ...
As it goes on to say, any Tax Credits claim by the couple shall :-Where one member of a married couple or unmarried couple is a person subject to immigration control, and the other member is not or is within any of Cases 1 to 5 or regulation 5 .....
Or to explain all this in language that is easier to understand ..... where one of the couple is British (or not subject to immigration control for any other reason) and the other of the couple is subject to immigration control, and therefore has a "No recourse to Public Funds" restriction on their visa, then for the purpose of Tax Credits only, their claim to Tax Credits shall be determined as if neither of them is subject to immigration control, that is, the claim can be made.be determined in the same way as if that person were not subject to such control
Source : Hansard : 27 Mar 2003 : Column 345WMr. Simon: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether a claim under the terms of Regulation 3(2) of The Tax Credits (Immigration) Regulations 2003 (S.I. 2003, No. 653, by a couple including a person who is subject to immigration control will not be considered to be a breach of any restriction contained in a visa. [104441]
Beverley Hughes: The provisions of Regulation 3(2) of The Tax Credits (Immigration) Regulations 2003 will be fully taken into account when any changes are made to the list of public funds given at paragraph 6 of the Immigration Rules. In line with this regulation, receipt of tax credits by a couple, including one member who is a person subject to immigration control, will not be regarded as a breach of any condition of leave to enter or remain.