- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
No.
This is where we need more information.
I am sorry, I am having problems understanding this. Why would a judicial review would had broken her legal continuous residence? If the visa renewal application, appeals etc were made in time?secret.simon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 5:10 pmIf it was a judicial review, to the best of my knowledge, her stay would not have been legally extended while the courts were doing the review and there would have been a break in the legal continuous residence. That clock would only have restarted from zero in 2017 when she was issued her FLR(FP).
Appeals (if provided for by the Immigration Rules for that specific visa type) and administrative review extend what is called Section 3C leave. Judicial reviews don't.
Ok, thank you. As far as I am aware the HO applied for a "judicial review" (an appeal at the upper tribunal courts) but they were refused permission for it.secret.simon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 7:25 pmAppeals (if provided for by the Immigration Rules for that specific visa type) and administrative review extend what is called Section 3C leave. Judicial reviews don't.
So, unless the judicial review leads to an order maintaining Section 3C leave, it will have lapsed. That means that the person would have not been legally resident in the UK for that duration. That would have reset the clock for continuous legal residence down to zero.
Judicial Review is always initiated by the applicant. The Home Office may appeal a judicial review that went against them, but the original judicial review would have been filed by you (or in your name).
We used a lawyer, however, she had to pass the case onto a Barrister when court day came around. I will contract them. I do not have a letter that says outright it is an appeal but it is inferred that it is - see screen shots. Thank you for your time.secret.simon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 7:45 pmDid you use a lawyer at this stage? You could clarify with the lawyer whether it was a judicial review or an appeal.
I can't view either of the two documents on two different devices.azo-2024 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:23 pmhttps://freeimage.host/i/JTUzHEF
https://freeimage.host/i/JTUz9B1
I can.secret.simon wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:49 pmI can't view either of the two documents on two different devices.azo-2024 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:23 pmhttps://freeimage.host/i/JTUzHEF
https://freeimage.host/i/JTUz9B1
Can you confirm that you have redacted all personally identifiable information (names, addresses, etc)? Keep in mind that anybody with an internet connection can come across these documents, including spammers and hackers.
Our case lawyer got back to us and confirmed that the case of an appeal and not a judicial review. Also everything was submitted in time, and the appeal submission was in time and occurred around about the 14/06/2016
Send passport stamps from the last 10 yearsazo-2024 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 18, 2023 8:35 pmHello,
I am wondering what documents are needed, and for how far back, for the ILR (Long residency) application - or what people have successfully used when applying.
So far I understand that you need: Proof of English test and Life in UK, passports that you have held, but that else is needed.
Evidence of 10 years residency? Would the HO already have that information up to the last renewal application and wherefore only need to provide details after that date?