I have come across this document on Gov UK website which mentions something interesting on page 58 within the PDF:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... yB_MILEEwz
It states the following:
Is there anything within the rules that prevent this? I was of the understanding that if a person was on the 5 year route and has completed 5 years but then could not meet the MIR, the applicant would then have to be put on the 10 year route and the clock is reset, however, what I read in that document seems to contradict my understanding?“Prior to the last decision, the customer had completed a continuous period of 60 months
on the Spouse/Partner route. The last grant was made under the Family/Private life route to
a failure to meet the MIR.
As the customer has that “banked” period of continuous leave on the 5 year route and the
failure to be granted ILR was not time related, the 10-year route does not preclude them for
applying for ILR at any time during that period of leave if they can demonstrate they have
addressed the reason for failure in this case MIR and continue to meet all other suitability
and eligibility requirements and submit a paid application.
It is not currently made clear in our grant letters that this course of action is open to them.”
Is it possible for someone to have spent 5 years on the 5 year route, then could not meet the MIR and then is placed on the 10 year route, to then be able to apply for SET(M) immediately once meeting the MIR on the basis of "previously" completing 5 years under the 5 year route?
